Literature DB >> 11515948

Anesthetic efficacy of infiltrations in mandibular anterior teeth.

T Yonchak1, A Reader, M Beck, K Clark, W J Meyers.   

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to measure the degree of anesthesia obtained with a labial infiltration of either 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 or 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in mandibular anterior teeth. Another objective was to measure the degree of anesthesia obtained with a lingual infiltration of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in mandibular anterior teeth. Through use of a repeated-measures design, 40 subjects randomly received a labial infiltration at the lateral incisor apex of either 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine or 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine at 2 separate appointments. An additional 40 subjects received a lingual infiltration at the lateral incisor apex of 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The mandibular anterior teeth were blindly pulp tested at 4-minute cycles for 60 minutes postinjection. No response from the subject to the maximum output (80 reading) of the pulp tester was used as the criterion for pulpal anesthesia. Anesthesia was considered successful when 2 consecutive 80 readings were obtained. For the 3 infiltrations, success rates for the lateral incisor ranged from 43 to 50%. Adjacent teeth had success rates of 27 to 63%. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in success between the labial infiltration of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine or the lingual infiltration of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine when compared with the labial infiltration of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Duration of pulpal anesthesia declined steadily for all solutions over the 60 minutes. In conclusion, the success rate of 43-50% and declining duration of pulpal anesthesia over an hour indicates that a labial infiltration of 1.8 mL of either 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine or 1: 50,000 epinephrine or a lingual infiltration of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine over the lateral incisor apex cannot be recommended clinically to provide profound pulpal anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11515948      PMCID: PMC2007361     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Prog        ISSN: 0003-3006


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of mandibular infiltration versus block anesthesia in pediatric dentistry.

Authors:  A A Sharaf
Journal:  ASDC J Dent Child       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug

2.  An evaluation of 4% prilocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 2% mepivacaine with 1:20,000 levonordefrin compared with 2% lidocaine with:100,000 epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  S A Hinkley; A Reader; M Beck; W J Meyers
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1991 May-Jun

3.  The effectiveness of mandibular infiltration compared to mandibular block anesthesia in treating primary molars in children.

Authors:  C J Oulis; G P Vadiakas; A Vasilopoulou
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.874

4.  An evaluation of 2% lidocaine with different concentrations of epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  F B Dagher; G M Yared; P Machtou
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  Evaluation of mandibular infiltration versus block anesthesia in pediatric dentistry.

Authors:  D Donohue; F Garcia-Godoy; D L King; G M Barnwell
Journal:  ASDC J Dent Child       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr

6.  Anesthetic efficacy of the mylohyoid nerve block and combination inferior alveolar nerve block/mylohyoid nerve block.

Authors:  S Clark; A Reader; M Beck; W J Meyers
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1999-05

7.  An evaluation of volumes and concentrations of lidocaine in human inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  D L Vreeland; A Reader; M Beck; W Meyers; J Weaver
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.171

8.  A clinical evaluation of the electric pulp tester as an indicator of local anesthesia.

Authors:  A J Certosimo; R D Archer
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.440

9.  An evaluation of lidocaine hydrocarbonate compared with lidocaine hydrochloride for inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  M A Chaney; R Kerby; A Reader; F M Beck; W J Meyers; J Weaver
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec

10.  An evaluation of the incisive nerve block and combination inferior alveolar and incisive nerve blocks in mandibular anesthesia.

Authors:  R A Nist; A Reader; M Beck; W J Meyers
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.171

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Local anesthesia part 2: technical considerations.

Authors:  Kenneth L Reed; Stanley F Malamed; Andrea M Fonner
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2012

2.  Anesthetic efficacy of an infiltration in mandibular anterior teeth following an inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  Kenneth Clark; Al Reader; Mike Beck; William J Meyers
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2002

3.  The position of lingula as an index for inferior alveolar nerve block injection in 7-11-year-old children.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ezoddini Ardakani; Zahra Bahrololoumi; Maryam Zangouie Booshehri; Alireza Navab Azam; Fatemeh Ayatollahi
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2010-06-24

4.  A comparative evaluation of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine in mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: A clinical study.

Authors:  Sunith Maruthingal; Dennis Mohan; Ramesh Kumar Maroli; Ali Alahmari; Ahmed Alqahtani; Mohammed Alsadoon
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

5.  Anesthetic efficacy in vital asymptomatic teeth using different local anesthetics: a systematic review with network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amy Kia Cheen Liew; Yi-Chun Yeh; Dalia Abdullah; Yu-Kang Tu
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2021-07-21

6.  Effects of different topical anesthetics on pain from needle insertion and injection, and the influence of anxiety in patients awaiting endodontic treatment.

Authors:  Fatih Aksoy; Samet Tosun
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2022-06-07

Review 7.  Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia.

Authors:  Geoffrey St George; Alyn Morgan; John Meechan; David R Moles; Ian Needleman; Yuan-Ling Ng; Aviva Petrie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-07-10

8.  Articaine and mepivacaine buccal infiltration in securing mandibular first molar pulp anesthesia following mepivacaine inferior alveolar nerve block: A randomized, double-blind crossover study.

Authors:  Giath Gazal; Abdullah Muteb Alharbi; Khalid HidayatAllah Al-Samadani; Mohammad Dib Kanaa
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.