Literature DB >> 15384292

Anesthetic efficacy of an infiltration in mandibular anterior teeth following an inferior alveolar nerve block.

Kenneth Clark1, Al Reader, Mike Beck, William J Meyers.   

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective, randomized, blinded study was to measure the degree of pulpal anesthesia obtained with an inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) block followed by an infiltration in mandibular anterior teeth. Through use of a repeated-measures design, 40 patients randomly received 3 injection combinations at 3 separate appointments: an IAN block followed by a mock lingual infiltration and a mock labial infiltration, an IAN block followed by a mock lingual infiltration and a labial infiltration, and an IAN block followed by a mock labial infiltration and a lingual infiltration. Each IAN block used 3.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, and each infiltration used 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine administered over the lateral incisor apex. Mandibular anterior teeth were blindly pulp tested at 2-minute cycles for 60 minutes following the IAN-infiltration injections. No response from the patient to the maximum output (80 reading) of the pulp tester was used as the criterion for pulpal anesthesia. Anesthesia was considered successful when 2 consecutive 80 readings were obtained within 15 minutes and the 80 reading was sustained for 60 minutes. Anesthesia was considered a failure if 2 consecutive 80 readings were not obtained during the 60 minutes. The results of this study showed that 100% of the patients had lip numbness with all IAN blocks. For the lateral incisor, the success rate of the IAN block alone was 40% and the failure rate was 30%. For the IAN block plus labial infiltration, the success rate was 62% and the failure rate was 12% for the lateral incisor. There was a significant difference (P < .05) between the IAN block alone and the IAN block plus labial infiltration. In conclusion, a labial infiltration, over the lateral incisor apex, of 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine following an IAN block significantly improved pulpal anesthesia for the lateral incisor compared with the IAN block alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 15384292      PMCID: PMC2007388     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Prog        ISSN: 0003-3006


  23 in total

1.  Evaluation of mandibular infiltration versus block anesthesia in pediatric dentistry.

Authors:  A A Sharaf
Journal:  ASDC J Dent Child       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug

2.  An evaluation of 4% prilocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 2% mepivacaine with 1:20,000 levonordefrin compared with 2% lidocaine with:100,000 epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  S A Hinkley; A Reader; M Beck; W J Meyers
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1991 May-Jun

3.  The effectiveness of mandibular infiltration compared to mandibular block anesthesia in treating primary molars in children.

Authors:  C J Oulis; G P Vadiakas; A Vasilopoulou
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.874

4.  An evaluation of 2% lidocaine with different concentrations of epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  F B Dagher; G M Yared; P Machtou
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  Anesthetic efficacy of the intraosseous injection in maxillary and mandibular teeth.

Authors:  R Coggins; A Reader; R Nist; M Beck; W J Meyers
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1996-06

6.  An evaluation of 4% prilocaine and 3% mepivacaine compared with 2% lidocaine (1:100,000 epinephrine) for inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  C McLean; A Reader; M Beck; W J Meryers
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.171

7.  Evaluation of mandibular infiltration versus block anesthesia in pediatric dentistry.

Authors:  D Donohue; F Garcia-Godoy; D L King; G M Barnwell
Journal:  ASDC J Dent Child       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr

8.  Comparison of articaine and prilocaine anesthesia by infiltration in maxillary and mandibular arches.

Authors:  D A Haas; D G Harper; M A Saso; E R Young
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct

9.  A clinical evaluation of the electric pulp tester as an indicator of local anesthesia.

Authors:  A J Certosimo; R D Archer
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.440

10.  An evaluation of lidocaine hydrocarbonate compared with lidocaine hydrochloride for inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  M A Chaney; R Kerby; A Reader; F M Beck; W J Meyers; J Weaver
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec
View more
  2 in total

1.  Neural blockade anaesthesia of the mandibular nerve and its terminal branches: rationale for different anaesthetic techniques including their advantages and disadvantages.

Authors:  Jason Khoury; Grant Townsend
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-05-25

2.  Assessment of the Need for Routine Distolingual Local Anesthetic Infiltration in Addition to Traditional Inferior Alveolar, Lingual and Long Buccal Nerve Blocks in Mandibular Third Molar Extractions.

Authors:  S N Chandan; Sujeeth Kumar Shetty; Sahith Kumar Shetty; Vageesh Bhat
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2020-12-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.