Literature DB >> 18547150

Anesthetic efficacy of 3 volumes of lidocaine with epinephrine in maxillary infiltration anesthesia.

Paula Cristina Brunetto1, José Ranali, Gláucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano, Patrícia Cristine de Oliveira, Francisco Carlos Groppo, John Gerard Meechan, Maria Cristina Volpato.   

Abstract

The objective of this randomized double-blind investigation was to compare the anesthetic efficacy and injection discomfort of 3 volumes of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine for maxillary infiltration anesthesia. A total of 25 subjects received 0.6, 0.9, and 1.2 mL of the anesthetic buccal to an upper canine. Test teeth were assessed with electrical stimulation to determine onset and duration of pulpal anesthesia; soft tissue anesthesia and injection discomfort were assessed by pin-prick test and visual analog scale (VAS). Data were analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Friedman, and chi-square tests (alpha = 5%). The 1.2 mL dose induced faster onset of pulpal anesthesia, a higher success rate, and a longer duration of soft tissue/pulpal anesthesia than were achieved with the other doses (P < .05). No differences in injection discomfort were observed between treatments. It is concluded that maxillary infiltration anesthesia with lidocaine and epinephrine has a faster onset, a greater success rate, and a longer duration when a volume of 1.2 mL is used than when volumes less than 1.0 mL are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18547150      PMCID: PMC2424013          DOI: 10.2344/0003-3006(2008)55[29:AEOVOL]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Prog        ISSN: 0003-3006


  32 in total

1.  The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres?

Authors:  S L Collins; R A Moore; H J McQuay
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  MINIMUM DOSAGE TECHNIQUE IN THE CLINICAL COMPARISON OF REPRESENTATIVE MODERN LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENTS.

Authors:  A COWAN
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1964 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  A clinical evaluation of xylocaine anesthesia.

Authors:  A COWAN
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1956-12       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Pulpal anesthesia dependent on epinephrine dose in 2% lidocaine. A randomized controlled double-blind crossover study.

Authors:  E Knoll-Köhler; G Förtsch
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1992-05

5.  Comparison of the degree of pulpal anesthesia achieved with the intraosseous injection and infiltration injection using 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine.

Authors:  John Nusstein; Mark Wood; Al Reader; Mike Beck; Joel Weaver
Journal:  Gen Dent       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

6.  An evaluation of 4% prilocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 2% mepivacaine with 1:20,000 levonordefrin compared with 2% lidocaine with:100,000 epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  S A Hinkley; A Reader; M Beck; W J Meyers
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1991 May-Jun

7.  An evaluation of 4% prilocaine and 3% mepivacaine compared with 2% lidocaine (1:100,000 epinephrine) for inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  C McLean; A Reader; M Beck; W J Meryers
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.171

8.  Lack of differential effect by Ultracaine (articaine) and Citanest (prilocaine) in infiltration anaesthesia.

Authors:  D A Haas; D G Harper; M A Saso; E R Young
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  A clinical evaluation of the electric pulp tester as an indicator of local anesthesia.

Authors:  A J Certosimo; R D Archer
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.440

10.  Local anaesthesia in elderly patients. An experimental study of oral infiltration anaesthesia.

Authors:  A Nordenram; K Danielsson
Journal:  Swed Dent J       Date:  1990
View more
  14 in total

1.  Masking the bitter taste of injectable lidocaine HCl formulation for dental procedures.

Authors:  Yangjie Wei; Michael P Nedley; Sarit B Bhaduri; Xavier Bredzinski; Sai H S Boddu
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, 4% prilocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, and 4% prilocaine for maxillary infiltrations.

Authors:  Steven Katz; Melissa Drum; Al Reader; John Nusstein; Mike Beck
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2010

3.  A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% mepivacaine with 1 : 20,000 levonordefrin versus 2% lidocaine with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine for maxillary infiltrations.

Authors:  Ingrid Lawaty; Melissa Drum; Al Reader; John Nusstein
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2010

4.  Comparison of onset and duration of action of soft tissue and pulpal anesthesia with three volumes of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in maxillary infiltration anesthesia.

Authors:  K Sreekumar; Darpan Bhargava
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-05-18

5.  Efficacy of 4 % Articaine and 2 % Lidocaine: A clinical study.

Authors:  Deepashri H Kambalimath; R S Dolas; H V Kambalimath; S M Agrawal
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-04-05

6.  Anesthetic efficacy of a combination of 0.5 M mannitol plus 36.8 mg of lidocaine with 18.4 μg epinephrine in maxillary infiltration: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.

Authors:  Kevin Younkin; Al Reader; Melissa Drum; John Nusstein; Mike Beck
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2014

7.  A comparison of two anesthesia methods for the surgical removal of maxillary third molars: PSA nerve block technique vs. local infiltration technique.

Authors:  Ra Ed Ma Al-Delayme
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2014-02-01

8.  A Prospective, Randomized Double-Blinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Buffered Local Anesthetics in Infected and Inflamed Pulp and Periapical Tissues.

Authors:  Pandian Senthoor; Krishnamachari Janani; C Ravindran
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2019-02-01

9.  Comparison of bupivacaine and lidocaine use for postoperative pain control in endodontics.

Authors:  Saeed Moradi; Neda Naghavi
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2010-02-20

10.  Periodontal ligament injection versus routine local infiltration for nonsurgical single posterior maxillary permanent tooth extraction: comparative double-blinded randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Mohammad H Al-Shayyab
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.