Literature DB >> 21337023

Signal quality of single dose gadobenate dimeglumine pulmonary MRA examinations exceeds quality of MRA performed with double dose gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Pamela K Woodard1, Thomas L Chenevert, H Dirk Sostman, Kathleen A Jablonski, Paul D Stein, Lawrence R Goodman, Frank J Londy, Vamsidhar Narra, Charles A Hales, Russell D Hull, Victor F Tapson, John G Weg.   

Abstract

During a recent multi-center trial assessing gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (PE), the Food and Drug Administration announced a risk of nephrogenic sclerosing fibrosis in patients with renal insufficiency who had received intravenous Gd-based MR contrast agents. Although no patients in this trial had renal insufficiency, in cautious response to this announcement, the trial protocol was changed from an intravenous administration of 0.2 mmol/Kg of a conventional Gd-based MR contrast agent to 0.1 mmol/Kg of gadobenate dimeglumine. The study described herein compares the signal quality of pulmonary MRA performed with double dose conventional agent to single dose gadobenate dimeglumine. This study is a retrospective analysis of data from a prospective, multicenter study in men and women ≥18 years with documented presence or absence of PE. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at all participating centers, and all patients provided written indication of informed consent. We performed both objective and subjective analysis of pulmonary artery image quality. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the main pulmonary artery were assessed in single and double dose protocols and compared. SNR and CNR of the main PA were correlated with subjective quality assessment of main/lobar, segmental and subsegmental pulmonary arteries. Although there were individual outliers, both SNR (P = 0.01) and CNR (P = 0.008) were higher in all quartiles for examinations using gadobenate dimeglumine than with gadopentetate dimeglumine. Subjective quality of vascular signal intensity at each vessel order was significantly better for gadobenate dimeglumine (P < 0.0001), and correlated well with SNR and CNR at each order (<0.001). Because of agent high relaxivity, a single dose of gadobenate dimeglumine provides better pulmonary MRA signal quality than double dose of a conventional Gd-based MR contrast agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21337023      PMCID: PMC3141086          DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-9821-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  20 in total

1.  Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for MR angiography of peripheral arteries.

Authors:  Suzanne C Gerretsen; Thierry F le Maire; Stephan Miller; Siegfried A Thurnher; Christoph U Herborn; Henrik J Michaely; Harald Kramer; Angelo Vanzulli; Josef Vymazal; Martin N Wasser; Claudio E M Ballarati; Miles A Kirchin; Gianpaolo Pirovano; Tim Leiner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography of the renal arteries: blinded multicenter crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Authors:  Mathias Prokop; Günther Schneider; Angelo Vanzulli; Mathias Goyen; Stefan G Ruehm; Philippe Douek; Massimo Daprà; Gianpaolo Pirovano; Miles A Kirchin; Alberto Spinazzi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Time-resolved MR angiography: a primary screening examination of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and contraindications to administration of iodinated contrast material.

Authors:  Hale Ersoy; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Tianxi Cai; Tuan Luu; Joshua Rosebrook; Robert Mulkern; Frank Rybicki
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Field strength dependence of R1 and R2* relaxivities of human whole blood to ProHance, Vasovist, and deoxyhemoglobin.

Authors:  N P Blockley; L Jiang; A G Gardener; C N Ludman; S T Francis; P A Gowland
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Low-dose, time-resolved, contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography in cardiac and vascular diseases: correlation to high spatial resolution 3D contrast-enhanced MRA.

Authors:  M S Krishnam; A Tomasian; D G Lohan; L Tran; J P Finn; S G Ruehm
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  Performance of magnetic resonance angiography in suspected acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Alain Blum; Abdelouahab Bellou; Francis Guillemin; Philippe Douek; Marie-Claude Laprévote-Heully; Denis Wahl
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 7.  Gadobenate dimeglumine 0.5 M solution for injection (MultiHance) pharmaceutical formulation and physicochemical properties of a new magnetic resonance imaging contrast medium.

Authors:  C de Haën; M Cabrini; L Akhnana; D Ratti; L Calabi; L Gozzini
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Relaxivity of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine (Magnevist), Gadobutrol (Gadovist), and Gadobenate Dimeglumine (MultiHance) in human blood plasma at 0.2, 1.5, and 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Jörg Pintaske; Petros Martirosian; Hansjörg Graf; Gunter Erb; Klaus-Peter Lodemann; Claus D Claussen; Fritz Schick
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 9.  Renal safety of gadolinium-based contrast media in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.

Authors:  Elena Ledneva; Svetlana Karie; Vincent Launay-Vacher; Nicolas Janus; Gilbert Deray
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Methods of Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis III (PIOPED III).

Authors:  Paul D Stein; Alexander Gottschalk; H Dirk Sostman; Thomas L Chenevert; Sarah E Fowler; Lawrence R Goodman; Charles A Hales; Russell D Hull; Emanuel Kanal; Kenneth V Leeper; David P Nadich; Daniel J Sak; Victor F Tapson; Thomas W Wakefield; John G Weg; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.446

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Gadolinium contrast agents for CNS imaging: current concepts and clinical evidence.

Authors:  E Kanal; K Maravilla; H A Rowley
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  MR Pulmonary angiography: assessment of PIOPED III data.

Authors:  Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Cardiovascular imaging 2012 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography: does a higher relaxivity MR contrast agent permit a reduction of the dose administered for routine vascular imaging applications?

Authors:  Xiaoying Xing; Xiangzhu Zeng; Xuan Li; Qiang Zhao; Miles A Kirchin; Gianpaolo Pirovano; Xiaoying Wang; Yuan Li; Roberto Iezzi; Francesco De Cobelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Factors in the technical quality of gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for pulmonary embolism in PIOPED III.

Authors:  H Dirk Sostman; Kathleen A Jablonski; Pamela K Woodard; Paul D Stein; David P Naidich; Thomas L Chenevert; John G Weg; Charles A Hales; Russell D Hull; Lawrence R Goodman; Victor F Tapson
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Gadolinium deposition and the potential for toxicological sequelae - A literature review of issues surrounding gadolinium-based contrast agents.

Authors:  Kerry A Layne; Paul I Dargan; John R H Archer; David M Wood
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Multicenter, intraindividual comparison of single-dose gadobenate dimeglumine and double-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine for MR angiography of the supra-aortic arteries (the Supra-Aortic VALUE study).

Authors:  Yanjun Li; X Li; D Li; J Lu; X Xing; F Yan; Yuan Li; X Wang; R Iezzi; F De Cobelli
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Safety and adverse effects during 24 hours after contrast-enhanced MRI with gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) in children.

Authors:  Guenther Schneider; Hellmut Schürholz; Miles A Kirchin; Arno Bücker; Peter Fries
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-11-24

9.  Compensatory biliary and urinary excretion of gadobenate ion after administration of gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance(®)) in cases of impaired hepatic or renal function: a mechanism that may aid in the prevention of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis?

Authors:  M A Kirchin; V Lorusso; G Pirovano
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Low-dose gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI of the kidney for the differential diagnosis of localized renal lesions.

Authors:  Guenther Schneider; Thorsten Probst; Miles A Kirchin; Jonas Stroeder; Peter Fries; Arno Buecker
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.