Literature DB >> 8503196

The dimensionality of texture-defined motion: a single channel theory.

P Werkhoven1, G Sperling, C Chubb.   

Abstract

We examine apparent motion carried by textural properties. The texture stimuli consist of a sequence of grating patches of various spatial frequencies and amplitudes. Phases are randomized between frames to insure that first-order motion mechanisms directly applied to stimulus luminance are not systematically engaged. We use ambiguous apparent motion displays in which a heterogeneous motion path defined by alternating patches of texture s (standard) and texture v (variable) competes with a homogeneous motion path defined solely by patches of texture s. Our results support a one-dimensional (single-channel) model of motion-from-texture in which motion strength is computed from a single spatial transformation of the stimulus--an activity transformation. The value assigned to a point in space-time by this activity transformation is directly proportional to the modulation amplitude of the local texture and inversely proportional to local spatial frequency (within the range of spatial frequencies examined). The activity transformation is modeled as the rectified output of a low-pass spatial filter applied to stimulus contrast. Our data further suggest that the strength of texture-defined motion between a patch of texture s and a patch of texture v is proportional to the product of the activities of s and v. A strongly counterintuitive prediction of this model borne out in our data is that motion between patches of different texture can be stronger than motion between patches of similar texture (e.g. motion between patches of a low contrast, low frequency texture 1 and patches of high contrast, high frequency texture h can be stronger than motion between patches of similar texture h).

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8503196     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90253-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  15 in total

1.  The mechanism of isoluminant chromatic motion perception.

Authors:  Z L Lu; L A Lesmes; G Sperling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Measuring the amplification of attention.

Authors:  E Blaser; G Sperling; Z L Lu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Induced motion at texture-defined motion boundaries.

Authors:  A Johnston; C P Benton; P W McOwan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Spatial phase differences can drive apparent motion.

Authors:  A B Sekuler; P J Bennett
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-02

5.  Stereoscopic and contrast-defined motion in human vision.

Authors:  A T Smith; N E Scott-Samuel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Letter recognition reveals pathways of second-order and third-order motion.

Authors:  C E Ho
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-01-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Broad bandwidth of perceptual learning in second-order contrast modulation detection.

Authors:  Jiawei Zhou; Fangfang Yan; Zhong-Lin Lu; Yifeng Zhou; Jie Xi; Chang-Bing Huang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Neuropsychological evidence for three distinct motion mechanisms.

Authors:  Lucia M Vaina; Serge O Dumoulin
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Illumination frame of reference in the object-reviewing paradigm: A case of luminance and lightness.

Authors:  Anja Fiedler; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Perception of first- and second-order motion: separable neurological mechanisms?

Authors:  L M Vaina; A Cowey; D Kennedy
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.