Literature DB >> 26280265

Illumination frame of reference in the object-reviewing paradigm: A case of luminance and lightness.

Anja Fiedler1, Cathleen M Moore1.   

Abstract

The present study combines the object-reviewing paradigm (Kahneman, Treisman, & Gibbs, 1992) with the checkershadow illusion (Adelson, 1995) to contrast the effects of objects' luminance versus lightness on the object-specific preview benefit. To this end, we manipulated objects' luminance and the amount of illumination given by an informative background scene in experiments. In line with previous studies (Moore, Stephens, & Hein, 2010), there was no object-specific preview benefit when objects were presented on a uniformly colored background and luminance switched between objects. In contrast, when objects were presented on the checkershadow illusion background which provided an explanation for the luminance switch, a reliable object-specific preview benefit was observed. This suggests that object correspondence as measured by the object-reviewing paradigm can be influenced by scene-induced, perceived lightness of objects' surfaces. We replicated this finding and moreover showed that the scene context only influences the object-specific preview benefit if the objects are perceived as part of the background scene. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26280265      PMCID: PMC4666744          DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  28 in total

1.  The effects of luminance on affinity of apparent motion.

Authors:  S Nishida; T Takeuchi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

3.  Motion correspondence in the Ternus display shows feature bias in spatiotopic coordinates.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hein; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Perception of apparent motion between dissimilar gratings: spatiotemporal properties.

Authors:  P Werkhoven; G Sperling; C Chubb
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion.

Authors:  P Burt; G Sperling
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Situating vision in the world.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  The persistence of object file representations.

Authors:  Nicholaus S Noles; Brian J Scholl; Stephen R Mitroff
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-02

8.  The Role of Surface Feature Continuity in Object-based Inhibition of Return.

Authors:  A Caglar Tas; Michael D Dodd; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011-11-21

9.  Object correspondence across brief occlusion is established on the basis of both spatiotemporal and surface feature cues.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Steven L Franconeri
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-09-02

10.  Depth effect on lightness revisited: The role of articulation, proximity and fields of illumination.

Authors:  Ana Radonjić; Alan L Gilchrist
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-08-14
View more
  1 in total

1.  Task-specific engagement of object-based and space-based attention with spatiotemporally defined objects.

Authors:  Qingzi Zheng; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.199

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.