Literature DB >> 8838163

Spatial phase differences can drive apparent motion.

A B Sekuler1, P J Bennett.   

Abstract

Can shape differences drive apparent motion? Results from previous research are equivocal. Much of the confusion may be due to the use of relatively complex stimuli: letters or geometric shapes, comprising many spatial frequencies, phases, orientations, and contrasts. We focus on relatively simple stimuli: Gaussian damped f+nf compound sinewave gratings. We examine whether relative phase differences, which are critical for shape perception, can drive apparent motion. We find that some, but not all, phase differences can drive apparent motion. Specifically, stimuli that are easily discriminable and perceptually dissimilar can affect the solution of the correspondence problem. In this case, observers consistently perceive stimuli in one frame moving to the position of perceptually similar stimuli in the next frame. This general result holds over a wide range of spatial frequencies, orientations, and contrasts. Implications for theories of motion processing are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8838163     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  41 in total

1.  Inhibitory interaction in a split/fusion apparent motion: lack of spatial-frequency selectivity.

Authors:  S Nishida; Y Ohtani; Y Ejima
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The effects of luminance on affinity of apparent motion.

Authors:  S Nishida; T Takeuchi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Effects of element orientation on apparent motion perception.

Authors:  P Werkhoven; H P Snippe; J J Koenderink
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-06

4.  Shape similarity and distance disparity as apparent motion correspondence cues.

Authors:  S Shechter; S Hochstein; P Hillman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  What determines correspondence strength in apparent motion?

Authors:  M Green
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception.

Authors:  C Chubb; G Sperling
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Sensitivity loss in odd-symmetric mechanisms and phase anomalies in peripheral vision.

Authors:  P J Bennett; M S Banks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Apr 30-May 6       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Low spatial frequencies dominate apparent motion.

Authors:  V S Ramachandran; A P Ginsburg; S M Anstis
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Spatial phase or luminance profile discrimination?

Authors:  D R Badcock
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Effects of luminance and contrast on direction of ambiguous apparent motion.

Authors:  S M Anstis; G Mather
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  4 in total

1.  Spatio-temporal priority revisited: the role of feature identity and similarity for object correspondence in apparent motion.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hein; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Object correspondence: Using perceived causality to infer how the visual system knows what went where.

Authors:  Cathleen M Moore; Teresa Stephens; Elisabeth Hein
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Age-related delay in information accrual for faces: evidence from a parametric, single-trial EEG approach.

Authors:  Guillaume A Rousselet; Jesse S Husk; Cyril R Pernet; Carl M Gaspar; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.288

4.  Parametric study of EEG sensitivity to phase noise during face processing.

Authors:  Guillaume A Rousselet; Cyril R Pernet; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 3.288

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.