Literature DB >> 8497577

Adjusting for nonresponse bias in a health examination survey.

M L Rowland1, R N Forthofer.   

Abstract

There is a potential for nonresponse bias in most population studies using health examinations. This is true of the Mexican American portion of the Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (HHANES), conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics, in which unit nonresponse to the examination accounted for 24 percent of the sample. Even though the full effect of nonresponse can never be really known, ancillary information from the interview sample can be used in an attempt to adjust for bias in estimates. Two techniques for nonresponse bias adjustment are presented and illustrated using health status level and hypertension status from published studies based on the HHANES of 1982-84. The first approach uses conditional probabilities and the second approach uses direct standardization. The examples examine whether or not an adjustment for socioeconomic status, sex, and age--variables related to both response status and the conditions under study--changes the prevalence estimates of (a) Mexican Americans who report poor, fair, or good health status and (b) hypertension among Mexican Americans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8497577      PMCID: PMC1403390     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  5 in total

1.  A note on the measurement of hypertension in HHANES.

Authors:  A T Geronimus; L J Neidert; J Bound
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The art and science of interpreting survey data.

Authors:  C L Johnson; C E Woteki
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Investigation of nonresponse bias in NHANES II.

Authors:  R N Forthofer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Hypertension prevalence and the status of awareness, treatment, and control in the Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (HHANES), 1982-84.

Authors:  G Pappas; P J Gergen; M Carroll
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Hypertension in the Hispanic-American population.

Authors:  P V Caralis
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1990-03-12       Impact factor: 4.965

  5 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Measurement Errors in Dietary Assessment Using Self-Reported 24-Hour Recalls in Low-Income Countries and Strategies for Their Prevention.

Authors:  Rosalind S Gibson; U Ruth Charrondiere; Winnie Bell
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Selection bias in population-based cancer case-control studies due to incomplete sampling frame coverage.

Authors:  Matthew C Walsh; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Ronald E Gangnon; F Javier Nieto; Polly A Newcomb; Mari Palta
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Sampling procedures and sample representativeness in a national telephone survey: a Portuguese example.

Authors:  Sofia Correia; Paulo Dinis; Francisco Rolo; Nuno Lunet
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  triADD: the risk for alcohol abuse, depression, and diabetes multimorbidity in the American Indian and Alaska Native populations.

Authors:  Sheila S Tann; Scott T Yabiku; Scott K Okamoto; Jessica Yanow
Journal:  Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res       Date:  2007

5.  Estimation of non-response bias in the Medicare FFS HOS.

Authors:  Nancy McCall; Galina Khatutsky; Kevin Smith; Gregory C Pope
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2004

6.  Assessment of Non-Response Bias in Estimates of Alcohol Consumption: Applying the Continuum of Resistance Model in a General Population Survey in England.

Authors:  Sadie Boniface; Shaun Scholes; Nicola Shelton; Jennie Connor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.