Literature DB >> 20013144

Sampling procedures and sample representativeness in a national telephone survey: a Portuguese example.

Sofia Correia1, Paulo Dinis, Francisco Rolo, Nuno Lunet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This paper aims to assess the yielding of the sampling procedures and the representativeness of a sample evaluated in a national telephone survey in Portugal.
METHODS: The Portuguese telephone book (2007/2008) was the sampling frame for subjects >39 years (n = 1,934). The time spent with interviews and unsuccessful contacts was quantified and the yielding of the contact attempts compared according different schedules. Demographic and health characteristics of the participants were compared with those of the Portuguese population.
RESULTS: Among eligible individuals, the percentage of refusals was 40.4%, higher on Saturdays (45.2% vs. 30.7%) and evenings (45.2% vs. 36.7%). Evening interviews yielded a higher percentage of men (26.2% vs. 21.0%) and active workers (31.8% vs. 21.8%). Compared to the Portuguese population, our sample included a higher proportion of women (76.7% vs. 54.1%), elderly (>59 years: 61.4% vs. 46.2%) and more educated participants (>4 years: 38.3% vs. 26.3%). Sex- and age-specific estimates of smoking and obesity were similar to those in the Portuguese population.
CONCLUSION: Despite the difficulties in reaching participants, this strategy may produce unbiased estimates for important health indicators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20013144     DOI: 10.1007/s00038-009-0102-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Public Health        ISSN: 1661-8556            Impact factor:   3.380


  19 in total

1.  Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey.

Authors:  S Keeter; C Miller; A Kohut; R M Groves; S Presser
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

2.  Contacting controls: are we working harder for similar response rates, and does it make a difference?

Authors:  A Rogers; M A Murtaugh; S Edwards; M L Slattery
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Telephone coverage and health survey estimates: evaluating the need for concern about wireless substitution.

Authors:  Stephen J Blumberg; Julian V Luke; Marcie L Cynamon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Face-to-face household interviews versus telephone interviews for health surveys.

Authors:  R J Donovan; C D Holman; B Corti; G Jalleh
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.939

5.  Characteristics of survey participants with and without a telephone: findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  E S Ford
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Increasing response rates in telephone surveys: a randomized trial.

Authors:  W Smith; T Chey; B Jalaludin; G Salkeld; T Capon
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1995-03

7.  Adjusting for nonresponse bias in a health examination survey.

Authors:  M L Rowland; R N Forthofer
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  A comparison of three survey methods to obtain data for community mental health program planning.

Authors:  A L Hinkle; G D King
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  1978-08

9.  Factors associated with clinical assessment of overactive bladder and selection of treatment.

Authors:  A Diokno; P Lee; B H Zorn; W R Lenderking; M A Grossman; S A Bull; D Albrecht
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.393

10.  Effects of enhanced calling efforts on response rates, estimates of health behavior, and costs in a telephone health survey using random-digit dialing.

Authors:  A R Kristal; E White; J R Davis; G Corycell; T Raghunathan; S Kinne; T K Lin
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prevalence of asthma in Portugal - The Portuguese National Asthma Survey.

Authors:  Ana Sa-Sousa; Mário Morais-Almeida; Luis Filipe Azevedo; Rosa Carvalho; Tiago Jacinto; Ana Todo-Bom; Carlos Loureiro; António Bugalho-Almeida; Jean Bousquet; João Almeida Fonseca
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 5.871

2.  Predicting participation of people with impaired vision in epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Pedro Lima Ramos; Rui Santana; Laura Hernandez Moreno; Ana Patricia Marques; Cristina Freitas; Amandio Rocha-Sousa; Antonio Filipe Macedo
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.209

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.