Literature DB >> 25793159

Economic impact of minimally invasive lumbar surgery.

Christoph P Hofstetter1, Anna S Hofer1, Michael Y Wang1.   

Abstract

Cost effectiveness has been demonstrated for traditional lumbar discectomy, lumbar laminectomy as well as for instrumented and noninstrumented arthrodesis. While emerging evidence suggests that minimally invasive spine surgery reduces morbidity, duration of hospitalization, and accelerates return to activites of daily living, data regarding cost effectiveness of these novel techniques is limited. The current study analyzes all available data on minimally invasive techniques for lumbar discectomy, decompression, short-segment fusion and deformity surgery. In general, minimally invasive spine procedures appear to hold promise in quicker patient recovery times and earlier return to work. Thus, minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery appears to have the potential to be a cost-effective intervention. Moreover, novel less invasive procedures are less destabilizing and may therefore be utilized in certain indications that traditionally required arthrodesis procedures. However, there is a lack of studies analyzing the economic impact of minimally invasive spine surgery. Future studies are necessary to confirm the durability and further define indications for minimally invasive lumbar spine procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthrodesis; Cost efficiency; Minimally invasive spine surgery; Outcomes; Value-based medicine

Year:  2015        PMID: 25793159      PMCID: PMC4363801          DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Orthop        ISSN: 2218-5836


  75 in total

1.  The economic burden of back pain in the UK.

Authors:  N Maniadakis; A Gray
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  The effect of bilateral laminotomy versus laminectomy on the motion and stiffness of the human lumbar spine: a biomechanical comparison.

Authors:  Michael J Lee; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens R Chapman; Amy M Cohen; Richard M Harrington; Randal P Ching
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Tor D Tosteson; Jon D Lurie; Anna N A Tosteson; Brett Hanscom; Jonathan S Skinner; William A Abdu; Alan S Hilibrand; Scott D Boden; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The cost-utility of lumbar disc herniation surgery.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hansson; Tommy Hansson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  A clinician's guide to cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  A S Detsky; I G Naglie
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-07-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes.

Authors:  J N Katz; S J Lipson; R A Lew; L J Grobler; J N Weinstein; G W Brick; A H Fossel; M H Liang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Analysis of the direct cost of surgery for four diagnostic categories of adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Ian M McCarthy; Richard A Hostin; Michael F O'Brien; Neil S Fleming; Gerald Ogola; Rustam Kudyakov; Kathleen M Richter; Rajiv Saigal; Sigurd H Berven; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Surgical treatment of spinal stenosis with and without degenerative spondylolisthesis: cost-effectiveness after 2 years.

Authors:  Anna N A Tosteson; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Jonathan S Skinner; Harry Herkowitz; Todd Albert; Scott D Boden; Keith Bridwell; Michael Longley; Gunnar B Andersson; Emily A Blood; Margaret R Grove; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Richard A Deyo; Sohail K Mirza; Judith A Turner; Bryan A Comstock; William Hollingworth; Sean D Sullivan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Predicting outcome and complications in the surgical treatment of adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Frank J Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Keith H Bridwell; Stephen Glassman; Michael R Shainline
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  Is a drain tube necessary for minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion surgery?

Authors:  Pei-I Hung; Ming-Chau Chang; Po-Hsin Chou; Hsi-Hsien Lin; Shih-Tien Wang; Chien-Lin Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A comparative analysis of a disposable and a reusable pedicle screw instrument kit for lumbar arthrodesis: integrating HTA and MCDA.

Authors:  Claudia Ottardi; Alessio Damonti; Emanuele Porazzi; Emanuela Foglia; Lucrezia Ferrario; Tomaso Villa; Enrico Aimar; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Fabio Galbusera
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2017-05-03

3.  Analysis of factors affecting baseline SF-36 Mental Component Summary in Adult Spinal Deformity and its impact on surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Tiro Mmopelwa; Selim Ayhan; Selcen Yuksel; Vugar Nabiyev; Asli Niyazi; Ferran Pellise; Ahmet Alanay; Francisco Javier Sanchez Perez Grueso; Frank Kleinstuck; Ibrahim Obeid; Emre Acaroglu
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 1.511

4.  Risk factors predicting less favorable outcomes in endoscopic lumbar discectomies.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Katzell
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

5.  The role of surgery for treatment of low back pain: insights from the randomized controlled Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trials.

Authors:  Peter Abraham; Robert C Rennert; Joel R Martin; Joseph Ciacci; William Taylor; Daniel Resnick; Ekkehard Kasper; Clark C Chen
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-04-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.