Literature DB >> 18338156

[Spinal surgery in the elderly: does age have an influence on the complication rate?].

R Sobottke1, G Csécsei, T Kaulhausen, S Delank, J Franklin, E Aghayev, T Zweig, P Eysel.   

Abstract

In accordance with the demographic trend, the number of elderly patients with spinal diseases which require surgery will increase continuously. Up to now, age has often been regarded as a contraindication for an elective operation. However, a review of the existing literature, the results of the European spine register "Spine Tango" and our own results show that the rate of complications after minimally invasive spinal surgery is as low in the elderly as it is in the younger population. But the higher the complexity of surgery, the higher the rate of complications with increasing age. However, even elderly (>65 years) and very elderly (>80 years) patients seem to benefit from surgical treatment, independent of the extent of spinal surgery. Because chronic pain leads to physical limitations, an impaired quality of life as well as a declined state of health, and because surgery can significantly improve these factors, even while remaining aware of the operational risks, age itself should not be considered as a contraindication for spinal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18338156     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-008-1233-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  28 in total

1.  Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults.

Authors:  Leah Y Carreon; Rolando M Puno; John R Dimar; Steven D Glassman; John R Johnson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Predicting morbidity and mortality of lumbar spine arthrodesis in patients in their ninth decade.

Authors:  Christopher S Raffo; William C Lauerman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication.

Authors:  R W Porter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Long-term outcome of laminectomy for spinal stenosis in octogenarians.

Authors:  Klaus Galiano; Alois Albert Obwegeser; Michael Viktor Gabl; Richard Bauer; Klaus Twerdy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Five-year follow-up by an independent observer.

Authors:  B Jönsson; M Annertz; C Sjöberg; B Strömqvist
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Prevalence of symptoms of cervical and lumbar stenosis among participants in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study.

Authors:  Molly T Vogt; Peggy Mannen Cawthon; James D Kang; William F Donaldson; Jane A Cauley; Michael C Nevitt
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Are lumbar spine reoperation rates falling with greater use of fusion surgery and new surgical technology?

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Sohail K Mirza; Bryan A Comstock; Darryl T Gray; William Kreuter; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Adult spinal deformity surgery: complications and outcomes in patients over age 60.

Authors:  Michael D Daubs; Lawrence G Lenke; Gene Cheh; Georgia Stobbs; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Back pain in the German adult population: prevalence, severity, and sociodemographic correlates in a multiregional survey.

Authors:  Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Heiner Raspe; Michael Pfingsten; Monika Hasenbring; Heinz Dieter Basler; Wolfgang Eich; Thomas Kohlmann
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Outcomes of decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly diabetic patients.

Authors:  Zeev Arinzon; Abraham Adunsky; Zeev Fidelman; Reuven Gepstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-11-12       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Influencing factors on the length of stay in lumbar spine surgery : analysis of the German spine registry].

Authors:  C Herren; E Aghayev; T Kaulhausen; C Roeder; F Meyer; J Siewe; R Sobottke
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Accuracy of pedicle screw placement using neuronavigation based on intraoperative 3D rotational fluoroscopy in the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Nora Conrads; Jan-Peter Grunz; Henner Huflage; Karsten Sebastian Luetkens; Philipp Feldle; Katharina Grunz; Stefan Köhler; Thomas Westermaier
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Are the Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal/Posterior Lumbar Fusion Influenced by the Patient's Age or BMI?

Authors:  Neil Manson; Ulrich Hubbe; Paulo Pereira; Khai Lam; Salvador Fuster; Wolfgang Senker
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.723

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.