Literature DB >> 8695961

Diagnostic value of ultrasound analysis and bone densitometry as predictors of vertebral deformity in postmenopausal women.

S Gonnelli1, C Cepollaro, D Agnusdei, R Palmieri, S Rossi, C Gennari.   

Abstract

Bone fractures depend not only on bone density, but also on bone quality. Ultrasound (US) has been proposed as a technique for evaluating skeletal status. Speed of sound (SOS) and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) are the US properties currently used to assess bone strength and fragility. In 304 postmenopausal women (age 58.8 +/- 5.5 years) we measured: bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine (by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), SOS, BUA and Stiffness in the os calcis (using an Achilles machine). In all subjects we performed lateral lumbar and thoracic radiographs. Morphometric parameters were derived by measuring the anterior, middle and posterior height of each vertebral body, to obtain a semiquantitative grading of vertebral fractures as follows: 0, no vertebral deformity; 1, any vertebral height reduced between 20% and 25%; 2, any vertebral height reduced between 25% and 40%; 3, any vertebral height reduced more than 40%. On the basis of the number and severity of vertebral deformities the women were divided into: group 1 (n = 79), normal; group 2 (n = 80), mild; group 3 (n = 85), moderate; and group 4 (n = 60), severe. Mean values of SOS, BUA, Stiffness and BMD were significantly lower (p < 0.001) in women with vertebral deformity than in normals. In the whole population SOS, BUA and Stiffness values were significantly correlated with BMD. SOS, BUA and Stiffness values were significantly decreased (p < 0.001) with vertebral deformity, as was BMD. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed BMD to be slightly better than Stiffness in discriminating among groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that BMD, BUA, SOS and Stiffness were independent predictors of vertebral fracture risk. Ultrasound parameters were still significant independent predictors of vertebral fracture even after adjusting for BMD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8695961     DOI: 10.1007/bf01626601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  36 in total

1.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women.

Authors:  L J Melton; S H Kan; M A Frye; H W Wahner; W M O'Fallon; B L Riggs
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Ultrasound velocity, through bone predicts incident vertebral deformity.

Authors:  R P Heaney; L V Avioli; C H Chesnut; J Lappe; R R Recker; G H Brandenburger
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Osteoporosis: recent advances in pathogenesis and treatment.

Authors:  C Cooper; A Aihie
Journal:  Q J Med       Date:  1994-04

4.  Preliminary evaluation of a new ultrasound bone densitometer.

Authors:  B Lees; J C Stevenson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Velocity of ultrasound at the patella: influence of age, menopause and estrogen replacement therapy.

Authors:  R Lehmann; M Wapniarz; H M Kvasnicka; K Klein; B Allolio
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Screening for osteoporosis: comparison between dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and broadband ultrasound attenuation in 1000 perimenopausal women.

Authors:  A Massie; D M Reid; R W Porter
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Detection of prefracture spinal osteoporosis using bone mineral absorptiometry.

Authors:  P D Ross; R D Wasnich; J M Vogel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  The assessment of vertebral deformity: a method for use in population studies and clinical trials.

Authors:  E V McCloskey; T D Spector; K S Eyres; E D Fern; N O'Rourke; S Vasikaran; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  The vertebral fracture cascade in osteoporosis: a review of aetiopathogenesis.

Authors:  A M Briggs; A M Greig; J D Wark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Quantitative ultrasound for the assessment of bone status.

Authors:  R Morita; I Yamamoto; I Yuu; Y Hamanaka; T Ohta; M Takada; R Matsushita; K Masuda
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  The epidemiology of quantitative ultrasound: a review of the relationships with bone mass, osteoporosis and fracture risk.

Authors:  E W Gregg; A M Kriska; L M Salamone; M M Roberts; S J Anderson; R E Ferrell; L H Kuller; J A Cauley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: a review.

Authors:  C F Njeh; C M Boivin; C M Langton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  The use of ultrasound in the assessment of bone status.

Authors:  S Gonnelli; C Cepollaro
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Quantitative ultrasound and radiographic absorptiometry are associated with vertebral deformity in Japanese Women: the Hizen-Oshima study.

Authors:  Y Abe; N Takamura; Z Ye; M Tomita; M Osaki; Y Kusano; T Nakamura; K Aoyagi; S Honda
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Evaluation of bone density in infancy and adolescence. Review of medical literature and personal experience.

Authors:  Luisella Pedrotti; Barbara Bertani; Gabriella Tuvo; Francesca Barone; Ilaria Crivellari; Stefano Lucanto; Mora Redento
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-05

8.  Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) in the Management of Osteoporosis and Assessment of Fracture Risk: An Update.

Authors:  Didier Hans; Antoine Métrailler; Elena Gonzalez Rodriguez; Olivier Lamy; Enisa Shevroja
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density: discriminatory ability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and controls with and without vertebral deformities.

Authors:  R E Ørstavik; G Haugeberg; T Uhlig; P Mowinckel; T K Kvien; J A Falch; J I Halse
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Quantitative ultrasound is better correlated with bone mineral density and biochemical bone markers in elderly women.

Authors:  Vasiliki Lappa; Ismene A Dontas; George Trovas; Evangelia Constantelou; Antonios Galanos; George P Lyritis
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 3.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.