Literature DB >> 7641747

A correlative study of ultrasound calcaneal and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone measurements of the lumbar spine and femur in 1000 women.

L Rosenthall1, A Tenenhouse, J Caminis.   

Abstract

The objectives of the study were firstly to determine the accuracy of ultrasound calcaneal measurements in the prediction of bone mineral density determinations with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and Ward's triangle (FW) in a mixed population of 1000 women, unsorted as to diagnosis, and secondly to determine the accuracy of the various site-specific measurements in predicting each other. Ultrasound measurements [stiffness, speed of sound (SOS) and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA)] were made with the Lunar Achilles device, and the bone mineral density (BMD) of the LS, FN and FW were determined with the Lunar DPX. The data were analyzed for correlation, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of various paired sites. The coefficients of correlation of the young adult t-scores in the total group between calcaneal stiffness and BMDs of the LS, FN, and FW varied between 0.53 and 0.60. Coefficients for LS versus FN and FW were 0.70 and 0.62, respectively. A comparison of SOS and BUA values obtained at the calcaneus with BMDs of the LS, FN and FW yielded correlation coefficients that varied from 0.54 to 0.56. The general accuracy of prediction of one site by another ranged from 64.2% to 74.4%, where normality was defined as a t-score > -2. It is concluded that no site can predict the status of another site with sufficiently high accuracy to be clinically useful. The role of ultrasound transmission in bone as a predictor of fracture risk is theoretically promising, but has yet to be proved by a long term prospective study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7641747     DOI: 10.1007/bf00839053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  6 in total

1.  Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W S Browner; J A Cauley; H K Genant; S R Mascioli; J C Scott; D G Seeley; P Steiger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Ultrasound measurements on os calcis: precision and age-related changes in a normal female population.

Authors:  A M Schott; D Hans; E Sornay-Rendu; P D Delmas; P J Meunier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Broadband ultrasound attenuation compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in screening for postmenopausal low bone density.

Authors:  H Young; S Howey; D W Purdie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Clinical determination of bone quality: is ultrasound an answer?

Authors:  G H Brandenburger
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Three quantitative ultrasound parameters reflect bone structure.

Authors:  C C Glüer; C Y Wu; M Jergas; S A Goldstein; H K Genant
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Quantitative ultrasound of the heel: correlation with densitometric measurements at different skeletal sites.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; M R McClung; L J Coleman; E Kingston-Sandahl
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.507

  6 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis: reviews in endocrine and metabolic disorders.

Authors:  A T Shields; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 2.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: a review.

Authors:  C F Njeh; C M Boivin; C M Langton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Correlation of ultrasound velocity in the tibial cortex, calcaneal ultrasonography, and bone mineral densitometry of the spine and femur.

Authors:  L Rosenthall; J Caminis; A Tenenhouse
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Bone status in rheumatoid arthritis assessed at peripheral sites by three different quantitative ultrasound devices.

Authors:  O R Madsen; C Suetta; C Egsmose; J S Lorentzen; O H Sørensen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2004-05-18       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry alone or in combination in a triage approach for assessment of osteoporosis: a study of older women with a high prevalence of falls.

Authors:  Katja Thomsen; Jesper Ryg; Anne P Hermann; Lars Matzen; Tahir Masud
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.921

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.