Literature DB >> 8478745

Mapping cone photopigment optical density.

A E Elsner1, S A Burns, R H Webb.   

Abstract

The distribution of cone photopigment across the retina affects the amount of light captured by cones at each retinal location. Cone photopigment optical density is measured in two ways, with reflectometry and/or with color matching. Color matching measures a higher optical density than does reflectometry. Control experiments confirm that large-field color matches measure photopigment optical density toward their outer edge. There is qualitative agreement as to photopigment distribution from both techniques near the fovea. Beyond 1 deg, color matching indicates little decrease in photopigment with increasing eccentricity, whereas retinal densitometry shows a steep decline in photopigment. The decrease in perifoveal optical density measured with reflectometry is attributed to the decrease in cone coverage from fovea to perifovea as rods and interphotoreceptor spaces increase. Differences among subjects in photopigment distribution near the fovea, measured with both techniques, reflect differences in the specialization of the foveal center for cone length and/or photopigment concentration per cone, which are factors influencing results from both techniques.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8478745     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.10.000052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A        ISSN: 0740-3232            Impact factor:   2.129


  17 in total

1.  Senescence of foveal and parafoveal cone sensitivities and their relations to macular pigment density.

Authors:  J S Werner; M L Bieber; B E Schefrin
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Investigating the light absorption in a single pass through the photoreceptor layer by means of the lipofuscin fluorescence.

Authors:  Pedro M Prieto; James S McLellan; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Autofluorescence characteristics of normal foveas and reconstruction of foveal autofluorescence from limited data subsets.

Authors:  R Theodore Smith; Jan P Koniarek; Jackie Chan; Takayuki Nagasaki; Janet R Sparrow; Kevin Langton
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  In vivo functional imaging of human cone photoreceptors.

Authors:  Ravi S Jonnal; Jungtae Rha; Yan Zhang; Barry Cense; Weihua Gao; Donald T Miller
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Spatial distribution of macular birefringence associated with the Henle fibers.

Authors:  Ann E Elsner; Anke Weber; Michael C Cheney; Dean A Vannasdale
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  In vivo functional imaging of human cone photoreceptors.

Authors:  Ravi S Jonnal; Jungtae Rha; Yan Zhang; Barry Cense; Weihua Gao; Donald T Miller
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Variation of cone photoreceptor packing density with retinal eccentricity and age.

Authors:  Hongxin Song; Toco Yuen Ping Chui; Zhangyi Zhong; Ann E Elsner; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Variations in photoreceptor directionally across the central retina.

Authors:  S A Burns; S Wu; J C He; A E Elsner
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  New wrinkles in retinal densitometry.

Authors:  Benjamin D Masella; Jennifer J Hunter; David R Williams
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Photopigment optical density of the human foveola and a paradoxical senescent increase outside the fovea.

Authors:  Agnes B Renner; Holger Knau; Maureen Neitz; Jay Neitz; John S Werner
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.