PURPOSE: To study the variation of cone photoreceptor packing density across the retina in healthy subjects of different ages. METHODS: High-resolution adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope (AOSLO) systems were used to systematically image the retinas of two groups of subjects of different ages. Ten younger subjects (age range, 22-35 years) and 10 older subjects (age range, 50-65 years) were tested. Strips of cone photoreceptors, approximately 12° × 1.8° long were imaged for each of the four primary retinal meridians: superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal. Cone photoreceptors within the strips were counted, and cone photoreceptor packing density was calculated. Statistical analysis (three-way ANOVA) was used to calculate the interaction for cone photoreceptor packing density between age, meridian, and eccentricity. RESULTS: As expected, cone photoreceptor packing density was higher close to the fovea and decreased with increasing retinal eccentricity from 0.18 to 3.5 mm (∼0.6-12°). Older subjects had approximately 75% of the cone density at 0.18 mm (∼0.6°), and this difference decreased rapidly with eccentricity, with the two groups having similar cone photoreceptor packing densities beyond 0.5 mm retinal eccentricity on average. CONCLUSIONS: Cone packing density in the living human retina decreases as a function of age within the foveal center with the largest difference being found at our most central measurement site. At all ages, the retina showed meridional difference in cone densities, with cone photoreceptor packing density decreasing faster with increasing eccentricity in the vertical dimensions than in the horizontal dimensions.
PURPOSE: To study the variation of cone photoreceptor packing density across the retina in healthy subjects of different ages. METHODS: High-resolution adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope (AOSLO) systems were used to systematically image the retinas of two groups of subjects of different ages. Ten younger subjects (age range, 22-35 years) and 10 older subjects (age range, 50-65 years) were tested. Strips of cone photoreceptors, approximately 12° × 1.8° long were imaged for each of the four primary retinal meridians: superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal. Cone photoreceptors within the strips were counted, and cone photoreceptor packing density was calculated. Statistical analysis (three-way ANOVA) was used to calculate the interaction for cone photoreceptor packing density between age, meridian, and eccentricity. RESULTS: As expected, cone photoreceptor packing density was higher close to the fovea and decreased with increasing retinal eccentricity from 0.18 to 3.5 mm (∼0.6-12°). Older subjects had approximately 75% of the cone density at 0.18 mm (∼0.6°), and this difference decreased rapidly with eccentricity, with the two groups having similar cone photoreceptor packing densities beyond 0.5 mm retinal eccentricity on average. CONCLUSIONS: Cone packing density in the living human retina decreases as a function of age within the foveal center with the largest difference being found at our most central measurement site. At all ages, the retina showed meridional difference in cone densities, with cone photoreceptor packing density decreasing faster with increasing eccentricity in the vertical dimensions than in the horizontal dimensions.
Authors: Shu Feng; Michael J Gale; Jonathan D Fay; Ambar Faridi; Hope E Titus; Anupam K Garg; Keith V Michaels; Laura R Erker; Dawn Peters; Travis B Smith; Mark E Pennesi Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Stephen A Burns; Ann E Elsner; Toco Y Chui; Dean A Vannasdale; Christopher A Clark; Thomas J Gast; Victor E Malinovsky; Anh-Danh T Phan Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2014-02-27 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Toco Y P Chui; Hongxin Song; Christopher A Clark; Joel A Papay; Stephen A Burns; Ann E Elsner Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-06-14 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Oscar San Emeterio Nateras; Joseph M Harrison; Eric R Muir; Yi Zhang; Qi Peng; Steven Chalfin; Juan E Gutierrez; Daniel A Johnson; Jeffrey W Kiel; Timothy Q Duong Journal: Curr Eye Res Date: 2014-03-21 Impact factor: 2.424
Authors: Dean A VanNasdale; Ann E Elsner; Todd D Peabody; Kimberly D Kohne; Victor E Malinovsky; Bryan P Haggerty; Anke Weber; Christopher A Clark; Stephen A Burns Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 4.799