Literature DB >> 25316726

New wrinkles in retinal densitometry.

Benjamin D Masella1, Jennifer J Hunter2, David R Williams3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Retinal densitometry provides objective information about retinal function. But, a number of factors, including retinal reflectance changes that are not directly related to photopigment depletion, complicate its interpretation. We explore these factors and suggest a method to minimize their impact.
METHODS: An adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope (AOSLO) was used to measure changes in photoreceptor reflectance in monkeys before and after photopigment bleaching with 514-nm light. Reflectance measurements at 514 nm and 794 nm were recorded simultaneously. Several methods of normalization to extract the apparent optical density of the photopigment were compared.
RESULTS: We identified stimulus-related fluctuations in 794-nm reflectance that are not associated with photopigment absorptance and occur in both rods and cones. These changes had a magnitude approaching those associated directly with pigment depletion, precluding the use of infrared reflectance for normalization. We used a spatial normalization method instead, which avoided the fluctuations in the near infrared, as well as a confocal AOSLO designed to minimize light from layers other than the receptors. However, these methods produced a surprisingly low estimate of the apparent rhodopsin density (animal 1: 0.073 ± 0.006, animal 2: 0.032 ± 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm earlier observations that changes in photopigment absorption are not the only source of retinal reflectance change during dark adaptation. It appears that the stray light that has historically reduced the apparent density of cone photopigment in retinal densitometry arises predominantly from layers near the photoreceptors themselves. Despite these complications, this method provides a valuable, objective measure of retinal function. Copyright 2014 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive optics; dark adaptation; densitometry; intrinsic signals; rhodopsin regeneration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25316726      PMCID: PMC4244068          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-13795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  43 in total

1.  Theoretical modeling and evaluation of the axial resolution of the adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  Krishnakumar Venkateswaran; Austin Roorda; Fernando Romero-Borja
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  THE DENSITY OF CHLOROLABE IN THE FOVEAL CONES OF THE PROTANOPE.

Authors:  W A RUSHTON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1963-09       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  STRAY LIGHT AND THE MEASUREMENT OF MIXED PIGMENTS IN THE RETINA.

Authors:  W A RUSHTON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Measurement of the scotopic pigment in the living human eye.

Authors:  F W CAMPBELL; W A RUSHTON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1955-10-28       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Slow optical changes in human photoreceptors induced by light.

Authors:  P J DeLint; T T Berendschot; J van de Kraats; D van Norren
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  In vivo fluorescence imaging of primate retinal ganglion cells and retinal pigment epithelial cells.

Authors:  Daniel C Gray; William Merigan; Jessica I Wolfing; Bernard P Gee; Jason Porter; Alfredo Dubra; Ted H Twietmeyer; Kamran Ahamd; Remy Tumbar; Fred Reinholz; David R Williams
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 7.  Origins of retinal intrinsic signals: a series of experiments on retinas of macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Kazushige Tsunoda; Gen Hanazono; Koichi Inomata; Yoko Kazato; Wataru Suzuki; Manabu Tanifuji
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  The Florida retinal densitometer.

Authors:  C Hood; W A Rushton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Mapping cone photopigment optical density.

Authors:  A E Elsner; S A Burns; R H Webb
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Human rhodopsin measurement using a T.V.-based imaging fundus reflectometer.

Authors:  D J Faulkner; C M Kemp
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  12 in total

1.  Safety assessment in macaques of light exposures for functional two-photon ophthalmoscopy in humans.

Authors:  Christina Schwarz; Robin Sharma; William S Fischer; Mina Chung; Grazyna Palczewska; Krzysztof Palczewski; David R Williams; Jennifer J Hunter
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Noninvasive imaging of the photoreceptor mosaic response to light stimulation.

Authors:  Vivek J Srinivasan; Alfredo Dubra
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  Austin Roorda; Jacque L Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 6.422

4.  Rod photopigment kinetics after photodisruption of the retinal pigment epithelium.

Authors:  Benjamin D Masella; Jennifer J Hunter; David R Williams
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 5.  Adaptive optics imaging of the human retina.

Authors:  Stephen A Burns; Ann E Elsner; Kaitlyn A Sapoznik; Raymond L Warner; Thomas J Gast
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 6.  Imaging Retinal Activity in the Living Eye.

Authors:  Jennifer J Hunter; William H Merigan; Jesse B Schallek
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 6.422

7.  Slow Cone Reflectance Changes during Bleaching Determined by Adaptive Optics Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope in Living Human Eyes.

Authors:  Masakazu Hirota; Suguru Miyagawa; Hiroyuki Kanda; Takao Endo; Tibor Karl Lohmann; Tomomitsu Miyoshi; Takeshi Morimoto; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Photosensitivity of Rhodopsin Bleaching and Light-Induced Increases of Fundus Reflectance in Mice Measured In Vivo With Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  Pengfei Zhang; Mayank Goswami; Robert J Zawadzki; Edward N Pugh
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  In Vivo Two-Photon Fluorescence Kinetics of Primate Rods and Cones.

Authors:  Robin Sharma; Christina Schwarz; David R Williams; Grazyna Palczewska; Krzysztof Palczewski; Jennifer J Hunter
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Characterizing the Human Cone Photoreceptor Mosaic via Dynamic Photopigment Densitometry.

Authors:  Ramkumar Sabesan; Heidi Hofer; Austin Roorda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.