PURPOSE: To develop mathematical and geometric models of the nonuniform autofluorescence (AF) patterns of foveas of normal subjects and to reconstruct these models from limited subsets of data. METHODS: Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (cSLO) AF fundus images of normal maculae were obtained from both eyes of 10 middle-aged subjects. They were filtered and contrast enhanced, to obtain elliptical isobars of equal gray levels (GLs) and determine the isobars' resolutions, eccentricities, and angles of orientation. The original image data were fit with a mathematical model of elliptic quadratic polynomials in two equal zones: the center and the remaining annulus. RESULTS: The AF images segmented into nested concentric GL isobars with GLs that increased radially from the least-fluorescent center. The mean isobar resolution was 31 +/- 7 mum. The geometric eccentricity of the ellipses increased from 0.42 +/- 0.12 centrally to 0.52 +/- 0.14 peripherally (P = 0.0005), with mean axes of orientation peripherally 97.12 +/- 15.46 degrees . The model fits to the complete image data had mean absolute normalized errors ranging from 3.6% +/- 3.7% to 7.3% +/- 7.1%. The model fits to small subsets (1% to 2% of total image data) had mean absolute errors ranging from 3.7% +/- 3.8% to 7.3% +/- 7.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Normal AF fundus images show finely resolved, concentric, elliptical foveal patterns consistent with the anatomic distribution of fluorescent lipofuscin, light-attenuating macular pigment (MP), cone photopigment, and retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) pigment in the fovea. A two-zone, elliptic, quadratic polynomial model can accurately model foveal data. This model may be useful for image analysis and for automated segmentation of pathology.
PURPOSE: To develop mathematical and geometric models of the nonuniform autofluorescence (AF) patterns of foveas of normal subjects and to reconstruct these models from limited subsets of data. METHODS: Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (cSLO) AF fundus images of normal maculae were obtained from both eyes of 10 middle-aged subjects. They were filtered and contrast enhanced, to obtain elliptical isobars of equal gray levels (GLs) and determine the isobars' resolutions, eccentricities, and angles of orientation. The original image data were fit with a mathematical model of elliptic quadratic polynomials in two equal zones: the center and the remaining annulus. RESULTS: The AF images segmented into nested concentric GL isobars with GLs that increased radially from the least-fluorescent center. The mean isobar resolution was 31 +/- 7 mum. The geometric eccentricity of the ellipses increased from 0.42 +/- 0.12 centrally to 0.52 +/- 0.14 peripherally (P = 0.0005), with mean axes of orientation peripherally 97.12 +/- 15.46 degrees . The model fits to the complete image data had mean absolute normalized errors ranging from 3.6% +/- 3.7% to 7.3% +/- 7.1%. The model fits to small subsets (1% to 2% of total image data) had mean absolute errors ranging from 3.7% +/- 3.8% to 7.3% +/- 7.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Normal AF fundus images show finely resolved, concentric, elliptical foveal patterns consistent with the anatomic distribution of fluorescent lipofuscin, light-attenuating macular pigment (MP), cone photopigment, and retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) pigment in the fovea. A two-zone, elliptic, quadratic polynomial model can accurately model foveal data. This model may be useful for image analysis and for automated segmentation of pathology.
Authors: M Trieschmann; G Spital; A Lommatzsch; E van Kuijk; F Fitzke; A C Bird; D Pauleikhoff Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2003-11-14 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Noemi Lois; Sarah L Owens; Rosa Coco; Jill Hopkins; Frederick W Fitzke; Alan C Bird Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Alan D Marmorstein; Lihua Y Marmorstein; Hirokazu Sakaguchi; Joe G Hollyfield Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Giuseppe Querques; Bénédicte M J Merle; Nicole M Pumariega; Pascale Benlian; Cécile Delcourt; Alain Zourdani; Heather B Leisy; Michele D Lee; R Theodore Smith; Eric H Souied Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: R Theodore Smith; Mahsa A Sohrab; Nicole M Pumariega; Kanika Mathur; Raymond Haans; Anna Blonska; Karl Uy; Dominiek Despriet; Caroline Klaver Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2011-01
Authors: Diane L Wang; Julia Agee; Marco Mazzola; Riccardo Sacconi; Giuseppe Querques; Alan D Weinberg; R Theodore Smith Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2019-08-07
Authors: R Theodore Smith; Jackie K Chan; Mihai Busuoic; Vasuki Sivagnanavel; Alan C Bird; N Victor Chong Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jonathan Aboshiha; Adam M Dubis; Jill Cowing; Rachel T A Fahy; Venki Sundaram; James W Bainbridge; Robin R Ali; Alfredo Dubra; Marko Nardini; Andrew R Webster; Anthony T Moore; Gary Rubin; Joseph Carroll; Michel Michaelides Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 4.799