Literature DB >> 8473618

Intermodulation distortion (F2-F1) in inner hair cell and basilar membrane responses.

A L Nuttall1, D F Dolan.   

Abstract

Round window (RW) recordings in guinea pigs show a large response at the frequency of the quadratic difference tone (QDT) at F2-F1 for high-frequency (> 8 kHz) tone pairs. The magnitude of the RW response is dependent on frequency and level of the primaries. The QDT cochlear microphonic produced is largest for primaries with a frequency separation of approximately 900 Hz. Its source is probably the local activity of hair cells in basal cochlear locations where the high-frequency tones interact. QDT measurements from locations inside the organ of Corti show that the magnitude of the QDT is largest in the inner hair cell (IHC) region and monotonically increases as the difference in the frequency of the primaries decreases. Measured as IHC intracellular ac receptor potential, the QDT appears to be the result of a mechanical stimulus to the cell rather than as an inherent property of the nonlinear transduction in the IHC. However, QDT of the same form is not evident in the velocity responses of the basilar membrane. These results suggest that the outer hair cells (OHC) produce a strong quadratic distortion product mechanical force to stimulate inner hair cells. This mechanical drive may not be present, or is a weak component, in basilar membrane motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8473618     DOI: 10.1121/1.406692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

Review 1.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Distortion in those good vibrations.

Authors:  M A Ruggero
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  Responses to sound of the basilar membrane of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  M A Ruggero
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Perception of the missing fundamental by chinchillas in the presence of low-pass masking noise.

Authors:  William P Shofner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-25

5.  Comparing the optimal signal conditions for recording cubic and quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Shixiong Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Persistence of past stimulations: storing sounds within the inner ear.

Authors:  Jiefu Zheng; Sripriya Ramamoorthy; Tianying Ren; Wenxuan He; Dingjun Zha; Fangyi Chen; Anna Magnusson; Alfred L Nuttall; Anders Fridberger
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Masking of low-frequency signals by high-frequency, high-level narrow bands of noise.

Authors:  Harisadhan Patra; Christina M Roup; Lawrence L Feth
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Optogenetic Control of Mouse Outer Hair Cells.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Sripriya Ramamoorthy; Teresa Wilson; Fangyi Chen; Edward Porsov; Hrebesh Subhash; Sarah Foster; Yuan Zhang; Irina Omelchenko; Michael Bateschell; Lingyan Wang; John V Brigande; Zhi-Gen Jiang; Tianyi Mao; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Two-tone distortion on the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero; N C Rich
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  A mechanoelectrical mechanism for detection of sound envelopes in the hearing organ.

Authors:  Alfred L Nuttall; Anthony J Ricci; George Burwood; James M Harte; Stefan Stenfelt; Per Cayé-Thomasen; Tianying Ren; Sripriya Ramamoorthy; Yuan Zhang; Teresa Wilson; Thomas Lunner; Brian C J Moore; Anders Fridberger
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 14.919

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.