Literature DB >> 26789771

Optogenetic Control of Mouse Outer Hair Cells.

Tao Wu1, Sripriya Ramamoorthy1, Teresa Wilson1, Fangyi Chen1, Edward Porsov1, Hrebesh Subhash1, Sarah Foster1, Yuan Zhang1, Irina Omelchenko1, Michael Bateschell1, Lingyan Wang1, John V Brigande1, Zhi-Gen Jiang1, Tianyi Mao2, Alfred L Nuttall3.   

Abstract

Normal hearing in mammals depends on sound amplification by outer hair cells (OHCs) presumably by their somatic motility and force production. However, the role of OHC force production in cochlear amplification and frequency tuning are not yet fully understood. Currently, available OHC manipulation techniques for physiological or clinical studies are limited by their invasive nature, lack of precision, and poor temporal-spatial resolution. To overcome these limitations, we explored an optogenetic approach based on channelrhodopsin 2 (ChR-2), a direct light-activated nonselective cation channel originally discovered in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Three approaches were compared: 1) adeno-associated virus-mediated in utero transfer of the ChR-2 gene into the developing murine otocyst, 2) expression of ChR-2(H134R) in an auditory cell line (HEI-OC1), and 3) expression of ChR-2 in the OHCs of a mouse line carrying a ChR-2 conditional allele. Whole cell recording showed that blue light (470 nm) elicited the typical nonselective cation current of ChR-2 with reversal potential around zero in both mouse OHCs and HEI-OC1 cells and generated depolarization in both cell types. In addition, pulsed light stimulation (10 Hz) elicited a 1:1 repetitive depolarization and ChR-2 currents in mouse OHCs and HEI-OC1 cells, respectively. The time constant of depolarization in OHCs, 1.45 ms, is 10 times faster than HEI-OC1 cells, which allowed light stimulation up to rates of 10/s to elicit corresponding membrane potential changes. Our study demonstrates that ChR-2 can successfully be expressed in mouse OHCs and HEI-OC1 cells and that these present a typical light-sensitive current and depolarization. However, the amount of ChR-2 current induced in our in vivo experiments was insufficient to result in measurable cochlear effects.
Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26789771      PMCID: PMC4724629          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.11.3521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  54 in total

1.  Developmental expression of the potassium current IK,n contributes to maturation of mouse outer hair cells.

Authors:  W Marcotti; C J Kros
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The response of hair cells in the basal turn of the guinea-pig cochlea to tones.

Authors:  A R Cody; I J Russell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Electrokinetic shape changes of cochlear outer hair cells.

Authors:  B Kachar; W E Brownell; R Altschuler; J Fex
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Jul 24-30       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells.

Authors:  W E Brownell; C R Bader; D Bertrand; Y de Ribaupierre
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Intermodulation distortion (F2-F1) in inner hair cell and basilar membrane responses.

Authors:  A L Nuttall; D F Dolan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Membrane potential and response changes in mammalian cochlear hair cells during intracellular recording.

Authors:  P Dallos
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Genomic characterization and expression of mouse prestin, the motor protein of outer hair cells.

Authors:  Jing Zheng; Kevin B Long; Keiji B Matsuda; Laird D Madison; Allen D Ryan; Peter D Dallos
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  A cochlear cell line as an in vitro system for drug ototoxicity screening.

Authors:  Gilda M Kalinec; Paul Webster; David J Lim; Federico Kalinec
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  Channelrhodopsin-2, a directly light-gated cation-selective membrane channel.

Authors:  Georg Nagel; Tanjef Szellas; Wolfram Huhn; Suneel Kateriya; Nona Adeishvili; Peter Berthold; Doris Ollig; Peter Hegemann; Ernst Bamberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The spatial pattern of cochlear amplification.

Authors:  Jonathan A N Fisher; Fumiaki Nin; Tobias Reichenbach; Revathy C Uthaiah; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Toward the Optical Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Tobias Dombrowski; Vladan Rankovic; Tobias Moser
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.915

2.  In vivo optogenetics reveals control of cochlear electromechanical responses by supporting cells.

Authors:  Victoria A Lukashkina; Snezana Levic; Patricio Simões; Zhenhang Xu; Joseph A DiGuiseppi; Jian Zuo; Andrei N Lukashin; Ian J Russell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Ancestral Adeno-Associated Virus Vector Delivery of Opsins to Spiral Ganglion Neurons: Implications for Optogenetic Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Maria J Duarte; Vivek V Kanumuri; Lukas D Landegger; Osama Tarabichi; Sumi Sinha; Xiankai Meng; Ariel Edward Hight; Elliott D Kozin; Konstantina M Stankovic; M Christian Brown; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 11.454

4.  The mechanoelectrical transducer channel is not required for regulation of cochlear blood flow during loud sound exposure in mice.

Authors:  George W S Burwood; Suzan Dziennis; Teresa Wilson; Sarah Foster; Yuan Zhang; Gangjun Liu; Jianlong Yang; Sean Elkins; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.