Literature DB >> 2522506

Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: where are they?

S Monsell1, M C Doyle, P N Haggard.   

Abstract

Compared the effect of frequency on lexical decision time (LDT) with that on reaction time (RT) in four other tasks, for the same words and subjects. Exp. 1 yielded an effect on semantic categorization RT (person vs. thing) similar in size and form to the effect on LDT. Exp. 2 yielded a substantial effect for syntactic categorization (noun vs. adjective), although weaker than the effect on LDT. In Exp. 3, the effect on naming RT for stress-final disyllabic words was identical to that on LDT, whereas the effect for stress-initial words was weaker. Exp. 4 showed no effect of frequency on delayed naming RT. The data undermine recent arguments for a (mainly) postidentification task-specific locus of frequency effects but are compatible with the older assumption (also characteristic of new PDP learning models) that lexical identification is a major locus of frequency effects (perhaps together with retrieval of meaning or phonology). But effects at that locus may be masked or diluted by other processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2522506     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.118.1.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  51 in total

1.  Naming the color of a word: is it responses or task sets that compete?

Authors:  S Monsell; T J Taylor; K Murphy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

2.  Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task.

Authors:  S Gerhand; C Barry
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-07

3.  Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task?

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Eva Rosa; Consolación Gómez
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

4.  Orthographic neighbors and visual word recognition.

Authors:  Laree A Huntsman; Susan D Lima
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2002-05

5.  Cascaded versus noncascaded models of lexical and semantic processing: the turple effect.

Authors:  Kenneth I Forster; Jo Hector
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-10

6.  Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition.

Authors:  C M Morrison; A W Ellis; P T Quinlan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-11

7.  The effect of semantic distance in yes/no and go/no-go semantic categorization tasks.

Authors:  Paul D Siakaluk; Lori Buchanan; Chris Westbury
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-01

8.  Electrophysiological evidence of different loci for case-mixing and word frequency effects in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Philip A Allen; Caitlin Crawford
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

9.  Comparing nouns and verbs in a lexical task.

Authors:  Françoise Cordier; Jean-Claude Croizet; François Rigalleau
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-02

10.  Reversing the Standard Neural Signature of the Word-Nonword Distinction.

Authors:  William W Graves; Olga Boukrina; Samantha R Mattheiss; Edward J Alexander; Sylvain Baillet
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.