Literature DB >> 8468083

The biomechanics of force distribution in implant-supported prostheses.

L A Weinberg1.   

Abstract

Force distribution with natural teeth depends on micromovement induced by the periodontal ligament. The location and cusp inclination of the tooth qualitatively alter the force pattern. Osseointegrated implants do not have micromovement associated with force distribution. Force distribution to the osseointegrated implant interface is completely different than with natural teeth. Alterations in tooth location and cusp inclination are suggested to limit implant overload. Force distribution in splinted natural teeth and osseointegrated prostheses are compared. The mechanism of interface force distribution and the consequences of poor interface fit are interrelated. The differential mobility of splinted natural teeth affects diagnosis and treatment. However, combining natural teeth with an osseointegrated prosthesis requires new design principles.

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1993        PMID： 8468083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN： 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  19 in total

1.  Osteodynamics around orthodontically loaded short maxillary implants. An experimental pilot study.

Authors:  H Wehrbein; M Yildirim; P Diedrich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Effect of proximal contact strength on the three-dimensional displacements of implant-supported cantilever fixed partial dentures under axial loading.

Authors:  Zhen-zhen Peng; Xin-min Chen; Jun Wang; Ai-jie Li; Zu-jie Xu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Full mouth rehabilitation with maxillary tooth supported and mandibular tooth and implant supported combination prostheses: a 4-year case report.

Authors:  A V Pramod Kumar; T K Vinni; Mehul R Mahesh
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-03-27

Review 4.  Management of abutment screw loosening: review of literature and report of a case.

Authors:  Vinod Krishnan; C Tony Thomas; Ipe Sabu
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-10-25

5.  Implant rehabilitation in bruxism patient.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Mariana Vilela Sonego; Daniela Micheline dos Santos; Emily Vivianne Freitas da Silva
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-06-06

6.  Biomechanical analysis of the stresses generated by different disocclusion patterns in an implant-supported mandibular complete denture.

Authors:  Gustavo Diniz Greco; Wellington Corrêa Jansen; Janis Landre Junior; Paulo Isaías Seraidarian
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Stress on external hexagon and Morse taper implants submitted to immediate loading.

Authors:  Caroline H Odo; Marcele J Pimentel; Rafael L X Consani; Marcelo F Mesquita; Mauro A A Nóbilo
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-07-29

8.  Influence of Post Angulation between Coronal and Radicular Segment on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth.

Authors:  Satheesh B Haralur; Anas Abdullah Lahig; Yahya Ahmed Al Hudiry; Abdullah Hassan Al-Shehri; Ahmed Abdullah Al-Malwi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-08-01

9.  Analysis of micromovements and peri-implant stresses and strains around ultra-short implants - A three-dimensional finite-element method study.

Authors:  Nida Sumra; Shrikar Desai; Rohit Kulshrestha; Khusbhu Mishra; Raahat Vikram Singh; Prachi Gaonkar
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2021-07-01

10.  Three dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution around the mandibular posterior implant during non-working movement according to the amount of cantilever.

Authors:  Ji-Man Park; Hyun-Joo Kim; Eun-Jin Park; Myung-Rae Kim; Sun-Jong Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 1.904
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.