Literature DB >> 8458753

Interrelations between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects.

A Moulin1, L Collet, E Veuillet, A Morgon.   

Abstract

Active cochlear mechanisms and especially outer hair cells seem to be involved in oto-acoustic emissions (OAEs) genesis. This study sought to investigate basic characteristics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs), click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TOAEs) and interrelations between SOAEs, TOAEs and 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 distortion product OAEs (DPOAEs) in 135 normally hearing subjects. A gender effect was shown on TOAEs and DPOAEs amplitude, and is attributed to the higher incidence of SOAEs in women (58%) than in men (22%). Moreover, SOAEs presence seems to mask the age effect found, especially at high frequency components, on TOAEs amplitude. A general influence of SOAEs on TOAEs and DPOAEs is shown, especially at frequencies ranging from 1 kHz to 3 kHz, collecting more than 66% of the SOAEs peaks recorded. Lastly, correlations between TOAEs frequency band amplitude and 2f1-f2 DPOAEs amplitude, shows frequency specificity, at least at low frequencies (i.e., from 0.5 to 2 kHz) in agreement with previous works suggesting that the 2f1-f2 DPOAEs generation site is at the geometric mean of the primaries. The same correlations calculated with 2f2-f1 DPOAEs amplitude show frequency specificity at low frequencies i.e., at 800 Hz and 1600 Hz. 2f2-f1 DPOAEs in humans are shown to be generated near the 2f2-f1 frequency region on the cochlear partition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8458753     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(93)90215-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  10 in total

1.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: amplitude modulation.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Kelly L Watts
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Ear effect and gender difference of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in children with auditory processing disorder.

Authors:  Kimberly Z Wissler; Kyoko Nagao; L A Greenwood; Rebecca G Gaffney; R M Cardinale; Thierry Morlet
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2014-07-18

3.  Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold fine structure.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-23

4.  Sex differences in distortion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions compared.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Dissociation between distortion-product and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in sheep (Ovis aries).

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Michelle D Valero; Eila K Roberts; Theresa M Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effect of prenatal androgens on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in male and female sheep (Ovis aries).

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Michelle D Valero; Eila K Roberts; Theresa M Lee
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.587

7.  Effect of age on click-evoked otoacoustic emission: A systematic review.

Authors:  Jinfeng Liu; Ningyu Wang
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 5.135

8.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in college music majors and nonmusic majors.

Authors:  Rebecca L Warner Henning; Kate Bobholz
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.867

9.  Comparative multivariate analyses of transient otoacoustic emissions and distorsion products in normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Mirela Cristina Stamate; Nicolae Todor; Marcel Cosgarea
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2015-11-15

10.  Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks.

Authors:  W Wiktor Jedrzejczak; Krzysztof Kochanek; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.