Literature DB >> 8455457

Oxygen consumption using the K2 telemetry system and a metabolic cart.

C Peel1, C Utsey.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of oxygen consumption (VO2), ventilation (VE), and respiratory rate (RR) between a relatively new portable, telemetry system (K2) and a system that has been shown to be valid and reliable. Duplicate measurements were made at rest and during four levels of exercise in 10 subjects. Heart rate values were comparable for exercise at the same work level during gas collection using the two systems, indicating that the metabolic stresses were similar. Oxygen consumption measurements were significantly lower using the K2 system compared with a metabolic measurement cart (MMC). There was no significant difference in VE, but RR was lower for measurements made with the MMC. Compared with the MMC, the K2 system uses a slightly different formula to calculate VO2 because the content of carbon dioxide in expired air is not measured. To determine differences resulting from the method of calculating VO2, MMC measurements were applied to the formula used by the K2 system, and K2 values were adjusted using the RER values obtained from the MMC. There were no differences between these calculated values and the values obtained directly from either the MMC or the K2 system. Consequently, we concluded that the lower VO2 values obtained with the K2 system were attributed to the method of collecting and analyzing expired air, rather than to the method of calculating VO2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8455457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  7 in total

1.  Accuracy and reliability of the ParvoMedics TrueOne 2400 and MedGraphics VO2000 metabolic systems.

Authors:  Scott E Crouter; Amanda Antczak; Jonathan R Hudak; Diane M DellaValle; Jere D Haas
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Automated metabolic gas analysis systems: a review.

Authors:  D J Macfarlane
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Comparison of gas exchange data using the Aquatrainer system and the facemask with Cosmed K4b2 during exercise in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Mathieu Gayda; Laurent Bosquet; Martin Juneau; Thibaut Guiraud; Jean Lambert; Anil Nigam
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Validity of a new portable indirect calorimeter: the AeroSport TEEM 100.

Authors:  S Novitsky; K R Segal; B Chatr-Aryamontri; D Guvakov; V L Katch
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1995

5.  Increase in energy cost of running at the end of a triathlon.

Authors:  C Y Guezennec; J M Vallier; A X Bigard; A Durey
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

6.  Validation of a new portable metabolic system during an incremental running test.

Authors:  Víctor Díaz; Pedro José Benito; Ana Belén Peinado; María Alvarez; Carlos Martín; Valter Di Salvo; Fabio Pigozzi; Nicola Maffulli; Fracisco Javier Calderón
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Assessing Cardiorespiratory Fitness of Soccer Players: Is Test Specificity the Issue?-A Review.

Authors:  Monèm Jemni; Mohammad Shoaib Prince; Julien S Baker
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2018-06-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.