Literature DB >> 8455156

Physical property comparison of 11 soft denture lining materials as a function of accelerated aging.

E R Dootz1, A Koran, R G Craig.   

Abstract

Soft denture-lining materials are an important treatment option for patients who have chronic soreness associated with dental prostheses. Three distinctly different types of materials are generally used. These are plasticized polymers or copolymers, silicones, or polyphosphazene fluoroelastomer. The acceptance of these materials by patients and dentists is variable. The objective of this study is to compare the tensile strength, percent elongation, hardness, tear strength, and tear energy of eight plasticized polymers or copolymers, two silicones, and one polyphosphazene fluoroelastomer. Tests were run at 24 hours after specimen preparation and repeated after 900 hours of accelerated aging in a Weather-Ometer device. The data indicated a wide range of physical properties for soft denture-lining materials and showed that accelerated aging dramatically affected the physical and mechanical properties of many of the elastomers. No soft denture liner proved to be superior to all others. The data obtained should provide clinicians with useful information for selecting soft denture lining materials for patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8455156     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90250-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  15 in total

1.  Effects of outdoor weathering on facial prosthetic elastomers.

Authors:  Panagiota N Eleni; Magdalini Krokida; Gregory Polyzois; Lawrence Gettleman; Gasan I Bisharat
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Structural damages of maxillofacial biopolymers under solar aging.

Authors:  P N Eleni; M K Krokida; M J Frangou; G L Polyzois; Z B Maroulis; D Marinos-Kouris
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Resilient liners: a review.

Authors:  Shobha Rodrigues; Vidya Shenoy; Thilak Shetty
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-07-06

4.  Comparative Evaluation of Tensile Bond Strength between Silicon Soft Liners and Processed Denture Base Resin Conditioned by Three Modes of Surface Treatment: An Invitro Study.

Authors:  Hemchand Surapaneni; Padma Ariga; R Haribabu; Y Ravi Shankar; V H C Kumar; Sirisha Attili
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-01-06

5.  Effect of 5.25 % sodium hypochlorite on color stability of acrylic and silicone based soft liners and a denture base acrylic resin.

Authors:  Alaa'a M Salloum
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-08-10

6.  Comparative evaluation of the tensile bond strength of two silicone based denture liners with denture base resins.

Authors:  Manish Mittal; S Anil Kumar; H S Sandhu; Satish R Iyer; Ratandeep S Ahuja
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-06-18

7.  The Effect of Primer on Bond Strength of Silicone Prosthetic Elastomer to Polymethylmethacrylate: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  Harsh Patel; Ravi Kumar C M; Ponnanna A A; Arvind Singh Bithu; Kelvin Shah; Soham Prajapati
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-03-01

8.  Evaluation of fluorinated polymers as coronary stent coating.

Authors:  I Verweire; E Schacht; B P Qiang; K Wang; I De Scheerder
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  The effect of denture base surface pretreatments on bond strengths of two long term resilient liners.

Authors:  Rahul Shyamrao Kulkarni; Rambhau Parkhedkar
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  The compatibility of denture cleansers and resilient liners.

Authors:  Luciana Valadares Oliveira; Marcelo Ferraz Mesquita; Guilherme Elias Pessanha Henriques; Rafael Leonardo Xediek Consani; Wagner Sotero Fragoso
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.