Literature DB >> 24431747

Comparative Evaluation of Tensile Bond Strength between Silicon Soft Liners and Processed Denture Base Resin Conditioned by Three Modes of Surface Treatment: An Invitro Study.

Hemchand Surapaneni1, Padma Ariga2, R Haribabu2, Y Ravi Shankar3, V H C Kumar4, Sirisha Attili5.   

Abstract

Soft denture liners act as a cushion for the denture bearing mucosa through even distribution of functional load, avoiding local stress concentrations and improving retention of dentures there by providing comfort to the patient. The objective of the present study was to compare and evaluate the tensile bond strengths of silicone-based soft lining materials (Ufi Gel P and GC Reline soft) with different surface pre treatments of heat cure PMMA denture base acrylic resin. Stainless steel dies measuring 40 mm in length; 10 mm in width and 10 mm in height (40 × 10 × 10) were machined to prepare standardized for the polymethyl methacrylate resin blocks. Stainless steel dies (spacer for resilient liner) measuring 3 mm thick; 10 mm long and 10 mm wide were prepared as spacers to ensure uniformity of the soft liner being tested. Two types of Addition silicone-based soft lining materials (room temperature polymerised soft lining materials (RTPSLM): Ufi Gel P and GC Reline soft) were selected. Ufi Gel P (VOCO, Germany), GC Reline soft (GC America) are resilient, chairside vinyl polysiloxane denture reliners of two different manufacturers. A total of 80 test samples were prepared of which 40 specimens were prepared for Group A (Ufi Gel P) and 40 specimens for Group B (GC Reline soft). In these groups, based on Pre-treatment of acrylic resin specimens each group was subdivided into four sub groups of 10 samples each. Sub-group I-without any surface treatment. Sub-group II-sand blasted Sub-group III-treated with Methyl Methacrylate monomer Sub-group IV-treated with chemical etchant Acetone. The results were statistically analysed by Kruscal Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Independent t test. The specimens treated with MMA monomer wetting showed superior and significant bond strength than those obtained by other surface treatments. The samples belonging to subgroups of GC Reline soft exhibit superior tensile bond strength than subgroups of Ufi Gel P. The modes of failure of all specimens were mostly adhesive in nature. Surface pre treatments by chemical means improved the bond strength between the silicone liners and denture base.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Denture base resin; Silicone soft denture liner; Tensile bond strength

Year:  2013        PMID: 24431747      PMCID: PMC3732717          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0235-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  13 in total

1.  Comparative study of water sorption, solubility, and tensile bond strength of two soft lining materials.

Authors:  A El-Hadary; J L Drummond
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  The effect of thermocycling on peel strength of six soft lining materials.

Authors:  A Sertgöz; Y Kulak; H Gedik; B Taskonak
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.837

3.  Adhesion characteristics of visible light-cured denture base material bonded to resilient lining materials.

Authors:  Z Khan; J Martin; S Collard
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  A polyvinylsiloxane denture soft lining material.

Authors:  J F McCabe
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Physical property comparison of 11 soft denture lining materials as a function of accelerated aging.

Authors:  E R Dootz; A Koran; R G Craig
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  A comparison of bond strengths among chairside hard reline materials.

Authors:  C A Arena; D B Evans; T J Hilton
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Comparison of tensile and peel bond strengths of resilient liners.

Authors:  O Kutay
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Lased and sandblasted denture base surface preparations affecting resilient liner bonding.

Authors:  N L Jacobsen; D L Mitchell; D L Johnson; R A Holt
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  Effect of denture base surface pretreatment on microleakage of a silicone-based resilient liner.

Authors:  Y Sinasi Saraç; Tarik Başoğlu; Gözlem K Ceylan; Duygu Saraç; Oktay Yapici
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Comparison of bond strength of six soft denture liners to denture base resin.

Authors:  F Kawano; E R Dootz; A Koran; R G Craig
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.426

View more
  4 in total

1.  Metal artifact reduction using common dental materials.

Authors:  Nicole V Hinchy; Nina K Anderson; Mina Mahdian
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength Between Two Commercially Available Heat Cured Resilient Liners and Denture Base Resin with Different Surface Treatments.

Authors:  Anshul Khanna; Vishrut Mohan Bhatnagar; Jyoti T Karani; Kunal Madria; Saloni Mistry
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-05-01

3.  Effect of denture soft liner on mandibular ridge resorption in complete denture wearers after 6 and 12 months of denture insertion: A prospective randomized clinical study.

Authors:  B Dinesh Babu; Veena Jain; Gunjan Pruthi; Nidhi Mangtani; Rajath S Pillai
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

Review 4.  The Effect of Sandblasting on Bond Strength of Soft Liners to Denture Base Resins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies.

Authors:  Fahimeh Hamedirad; Marzieh Alikhasi; Mahya Hasanzade
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-12-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.