Literature DB >> 27546966

Comparative evaluation of the tensile bond strength of two silicone based denture liners with denture base resins.

Manish Mittal1, S Anil Kumar1, H S Sandhu2, Satish R Iyer3, Ratandeep S Ahuja4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate and compare tensile bond strength of two silicone based liners with heat cure and heat cure high impact denture base resin at baseline and after storage in artificial saliva for 30 and 60 days.
METHOD: Heat cure conventional and high impact acrylic blocks (120 blocks each) prepared with final test specimen of two blocks of each resin with a liner. The baseline samples and those tested after 30 and 60 days interval stored in artificial saliva in thermal incubator, all were pulled apart in UTM at 20 mm/min. The tensile bond strength and mode of failure (adhesive/cohesive) were assessed. Mean, SD determined and analysis using one way ANOVA and paired 't' test.
RESULTS: The highest mean tensile bond strength (1.028 MPa) and the least i.e. 0.289 MPa was observed with Permaflex silicone liner against heat cure PMMA after storage in artificial saliva at 37 ± 1 °C.
CONCLUSION: The study rejected the null hypothesis because storage time in artificial saliva affected the bond strength of the resilient liners examined. The results revealed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) of artificial saliva storage on the bond strength of both the liners. After storage in artificial saliva for 30 days and 60 days at 37 ± 1 °C, all the specimens showed a significant reduction in the tensile bond strength.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Denture base resin; Resilient liners; Tensile stress

Year:  2015        PMID: 27546966      PMCID: PMC4982982          DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2015.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India        ISSN: 0377-1237


  23 in total

1.  Tensile bond strengths of hard chairside reline resins as influenced by water storage.

Authors:  A L Cucci; R N Rached; E T Giampaolo; C E Vergani
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.837

2.  Comparative study of water sorption, solubility, and tensile bond strength of two soft lining materials.

Authors:  A El-Hadary; J L Drummond
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Properties of resilient denture liners.

Authors:  R G CRAIG; P GIBBONS
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1961-09       Impact factor: 3.634

4.  Comparison of the physical properties of 11 soft denture liners.

Authors:  E R Dootz; A Koran; R G Craig
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Bone strength of resilient lining materials to various denture base resins.

Authors:  M S Al-Athel; R G Jagger; V Jerolimov
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.681

6.  A polyvinylsiloxane denture soft lining material.

Authors:  J F McCabe
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Bond strength of six soft denture liners processed against polymerized and unpolymerized poly(methyl methacrylate).

Authors:  F Kawano; E R Dootz; A Koran; R G Craig
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.681

8.  Effect of test method on the bond strength of a silicone resilient denture lining material.

Authors:  M S al-Athel; R G Jagger
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  Bond strength and failure analysis of lining materials to denture resin.

Authors:  A K Aydin; H Terzioğlu; A E Akinay; K Ulubayram; N Hasirci
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  Comparison of bond strength of six soft denture liners to denture base resin.

Authors:  F Kawano; E R Dootz; A Koran; R G Craig
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.426

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.