Literature DB >> 8454207

Recombination suppression by heterozygous Robertsonian chromosomes in the mouse.

M T Davisson1, E C Akeson.   

Abstract

Robertsonian chromosomes are metacentric chromosomes formed by the joining of two telocentric chromosomes at their centromere ends. Many Robertsonian chromosomes of the mouse suppress genetic recombination near the centromere when heterozygous. We have analyzed genetic recombination and meiotic pairing in mice heterozygous for Robertsonian chromosomes and genetic markers to determine (1) the reason for this recombination suppression and (2) whether there are any consistent rules to predict which Robertsonian chromosomes will suppress recombination. Meiotic pairing was analyzed using synaptonemal complex preparations. Our data provide evidence that the underlying mechanism of recombination suppression is mechanical interference in meiotic pairing between Robertsonian chromosomes and their telocentric partners. The fact that recombination suppression is specific to individual Robertsonian chromosomes suggests that the pairing delay is caused by minor structural differences between the Robertsonian chromosomes and their telocentric homologs and that these differences arise during Robertsonian formation. Further understanding of this pairing delay is important for mouse mapping studies. In 10 mouse chromosomes (3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15 and 19) the distances from the centromeres to first markers may still be underestimated because they have been determined using only Robertsonian chromosomes. Our control linkage studies using C-band (heterochromatin) markers for the centromeric region provide improved estimates for the centromere-to-first-locus distance in mouse chromosomes 1, 2 and 16.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8454207      PMCID: PMC1205350     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  23 in total

1.  Controlled silver-staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a 1-step method.

Authors:  W M Howell; D A Black
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1980-08-15

2.  Silver staining of synaptonemal complexes in surface spreads for light and electron microscopy.

Authors:  M E Dresser; M J Moses
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 3.905

3.  Centromere organization in chromosomes of the mouse.

Authors:  J B Rattner; C C Lin
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Synaptonemal complex analysis of mouse chromosomal rearrangements. IV. Synapsis and synaptic adjustment in two paracentric inversions.

Authors:  M J Moses; P A Poorman; T H Roderick; M T Davisson
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Variable modes of Robertsonian fusions.

Authors:  Y F Lau; T C Hsu
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1977

6.  Causes and consequences of Robertsonian exchange.

Authors:  B John; M Freeman
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1975-09-26       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Genes on chromosome 3 of the mouse.

Authors:  M T Davisson; E M Eicher; M C Green
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1976 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.645

8.  Conserved linkage of soluble aconitase and galactose-1-phosphate uridyl transferase in mouse and man: assignment of these genes to mouse chromosome 4.

Authors:  J H Nadeau; E M Eicher
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1982

9.  Application of the ovarian teratoma mapping method in the mouse.

Authors:  J T Eppig; E M Eicher
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Pericentromeric heterochromatin and A-T contents during Robertsonian fusion in the house mouse.

Authors:  C A Redi; S Garagna; G Mazzini; H Winking
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.316

View more
  31 in total

1.  Molecular analysis of nondisjunction in mice heterozygous for a Robertsonian translocation.

Authors:  Lara A Underkoffler; Laura E Mitchell; A Russell Localio; Shannon M Marchegiani; Justin Morabito; Joelle N Collins; Rebecca J Oakey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Recombination-suppression: how many mechanisms for chromosomal speciation?

Authors:  Benjamin Charles Jackson
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  The spread of an advantageous allele across a barrier: the effects of random drift and selection against heterozygotes.

Authors:  J Piálek; N H Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Extensive chromosomal repatterning and the evolution of sterility barriers in hybrid sunflower species.

Authors:  Zhao Lai; Takuya Nakazato; Marzia Salmaso; John M Burke; Shunxue Tang; Steven J Knapp; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Female meiosis drives karyotypic evolution in mammals.

Authors:  F Pardo-Manuel de Villena; C Sapienza
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Impact of Robertsonian translocation on meiosis and reproduction: an impala (Aepyceros melampus) model.

Authors:  Miluse Vozdova; Hana Sebestova; Svatava Kubickova; Halina Cernohorska; Thuraya Awadova; Jiri Vahala; Jiri Rubes
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Nondisjunction rates and abnormal embryonic development in a mouse cross between heterozygotes carrying a (7, 18) robertsonian translocation chromosome.

Authors:  R J Oakey; P G Matteson; S Litwin; S M Tilghman; R L Nussbaum
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genomic patterns of adaptive divergence between chromosomally differentiated sunflower species.

Authors:  Jared L Strasburg; Caroline Scotti-Saintagne; Ivan Scotti; Zhao Lai; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Heterogeneity in rates of recombination across the mouse genome.

Authors:  M W Nachman; G A Churchill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  A high incidence of meiotic silencing of unsynapsed chromatin is not associated with substantial pachytene loss in heterozygous male mice carrying multiple simple robertsonian translocations.

Authors:  Marcia Manterola; Jesús Page; Chiara Vasco; Soledad Berríos; María Teresa Parra; Alberto Viera; Julio S Rufas; Maurizio Zuccotti; Silvia Garagna; Raúl Fernández-Donoso
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.