Literature DB >> 11729161

Female meiosis drives karyotypic evolution in mammals.

F Pardo-Manuel de Villena1, C Sapienza.   

Abstract

Speciation is often accompanied by changes in chromosomal number or form even though such changes significantly reduce the fertility of hybrid intermediates. We have addressed this evolutionary paradox by expanding the principle that nonrandom segregation of chromosomes takes place whenever human or mouse females are heterozygous carriers of Robertsonian translocations, a common form of chromosome rearrangement in mammals. Our analysis of 1170 mammalian karyotypes provides strong evidence that karyotypic evolution is driven by nonrandom segregation during female meiosis. The pertinent variable in this form of meiotic drive is the presence of differing numbers of centromeres on paired homologous chromosomes. This situation is encountered in all heterozygous carriers of Robertsonian translocations. Whenever paired chromosomes have different numbers of centromeres, the inherent asymmetry of female meiosis and the polarity of the meiotic spindle dictate that the partner with the greater number of centromeres will attach preferentially to the pole that is most efficient at capturing centromeres. This mechanism explains how chromosomal variants become fixed in populations, as well as why closely related species often appear to have evolved by directional adjustment of the karyotype toward or away from a particular chromosome form. If differences in the ability of particular DNA sequences or chromosomal regions to function as centromeres are also considered, nonrandom segregation is likely to affect karyotype evolution across a very broad phylogenetic range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11729161      PMCID: PMC1461872     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  48 in total

1.  Recombination is proportional to the number of chromosome arms in mammals.

Authors:  F Pardo-Manuel de Villena; C Sapienza
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.957

2.  Rapid chromosomal evolution in island mice.

Authors:  J Britton-Davidian; J Catalan; M da Graça Ramalhinho; G Ganem; J C Auffray; R Capela; M Biscoito; J B Searle; M da Luz Mathias
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A new study challenges the current belief of a high human male:female mutation ratio.

Authors:  J F Crow
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Genetic measures of centromere activity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  E NOVITSKI
Journal:  J Cell Physiol Suppl       Date:  1955-05

5.  Non-random disjunction in Drosophila.

Authors:  E NOVITSKI
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1951-05       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Adaptive evolution of Cid, a centromere-specific histone in Drosophila.

Authors:  H S Malik; S Henikoff
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genic differentiation and origin of Robertsonian populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus Rutty).

Authors:  J Britton-Davidian; J H Nadeau; H Croset; L Thaler
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 8.  Cytogenetics of pregnancy wastage.

Authors:  A Boué; J Boué; A Gropp
Journal:  Adv Hum Genet       Date:  1985

9.  Susceptibility to vinblastine-induced aneuploidy and preferential chromosome segregation during meiosis I in Robertsonian heterozygous mice.

Authors:  F Pacchierotti; C Tiveron; J B Mailhes; M T Davisson
Journal:  Teratog Carcinog Mutagen       Date:  1995

10.  Unorthodox male meiosis in Trichosia pubescens (Sciaridae). Chromosome elimination involves polar organelle degeneration and monocentric spindles in first and second division.

Authors:  H Fuge
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  93 in total

1.  Sex-specific differences in meiotic chromosome segregation revealed by dicentric bridge resolution in mice.

Authors:  Kara E Koehler; Elise A Millie; Jonathan P Cherry; Paul S Burgoyne; Edward P Evans; Patricia A Hunt; Terry J Hassold
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Breaking Symmetry - Asymmetric Histone Inheritance in Stem Cells.

Authors:  Jing Xie; Matthew Wooten; Vuong Tran; Xin Chen
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 20.808

3.  B chromosomes are more frequent in mammals with acrocentric karyotypes: support for the theory of centromeric drive.

Authors:  Brian G Palestis; Austin Burt; R Neil Jones; Robert Trivers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Scrambling eggs: meiotic drive and the evolution of female recombination rates.

Authors:  Yaniv Brandvain; Graham Coop
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Neo-sex chromosome diversity in Neotropical melanopline grasshoppers (Melanoplinae, Acrididae).

Authors:  Elio R D Castillo; Claudio J Bidau; Dardo A Martí
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Contrasting GC-content dynamics across 33 mammalian genomes: relationship with life-history traits and chromosome sizes.

Authors:  Jonathan Romiguier; Vincent Ranwez; Emmanuel J P Douzery; Nicolas Galtier
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Prevalence of B chromosomes in Orthoptera is associated with shape and number of A chromosomes.

Authors:  Brian G Palestis; Josefa Cabrero; Robert Trivers; Juan Pedro M Camacho
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 8.  Selective microspore abortion correlated with aneuploidy: an indication of meiotic drive.

Authors:  Carol A Furness; Paula J Rudall
Journal:  Sex Plant Reprod       Date:  2010-10-01

9.  Centromere-associated meiotic drive and female fitness variation in Mimulus.

Authors:  Lila Fishman; John K Kelly
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Human centromere repositioning "in progress".

Authors:  David J Amor; Karen Bentley; Jacinta Ryan; Jo Perry; Lee Wong; Howard Slater; K H Andy Choo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.