Literature DB >> 8451429

Readability of informed consent forms for use with iodinated contrast media.

K D Hopper1, H A Lambe, S J Shirk.   

Abstract

Informed consent forms used before intravenous administration of contrast media by both private practice (Pennsylvania Blue Shield) and academic (Association of University Radiologists) physician groups were analyzed to evaluate for readability and content. Most of the 160 consent forms required at least a high school education to be understood; 10 (6%) required a college education. Consent forms from academic institutions tended to be longer and contain more problems with sentence structure than those from private practice. Consent forms from both groups tended to have a weak, wordy writing style. Although most of the consent forms discussed at least some of the potential adverse reactions from intravenous contrast media, 37 (23%) made no mention of any potential adverse reaction. Indeed, 25 (16%) made no mention of contrast media at all. Only 12 (8%) consent forms included a discussion of nonionic contrast media. The authors provide sample consent forms that cover the common risks of ionic and nonionic contrast media and describe the availability of nonionic contrast media; these forms are understandable by an individual reading at only an eighth-grade level.

Keywords:  Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8451429     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.187.1.8451429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  5 in total

1.  Variation in the readability of items within surveys.

Authors:  José L Calderón; Leo S Morales; Honghu Liu; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  The Quality of Informed Consent Forms-a Systematic Review and Critical Analysis.

Authors:  Julia Lühnen; Ingrid Mühlhauser; Anke Steckelberg
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  The use of multimedia in the informed consent process.

Authors:  H B Jimison; P P Sher; R Appleyard; Y LeVernois
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Can the written information to research subjects be improved?--an empirical study.

Authors:  E Bjørn; P Rossel; S Holm
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 5.  Use of contrast media in diagnostic imaging: medico-legal considerations.

Authors:  C Pomara; N Pascale; F Maglietta; M Neri; I Riezzo; E Turillazzi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.469

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.