Literature DB >> 16401705

Variation in the readability of items within surveys.

José L Calderón1, Leo S Morales, Honghu Liu, Ron D Hays.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to estimate the variation in the readability of survey items within 2 widely used health-related quality-of-life surveys: the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) and the Short Form Health Survey, version 2 (SF-36v2). Flesch-Kincaid and Flesch Reading Ease formulas were used to estimate readability. Individual survey item scores and descriptive statistics for each survey were calculated. Variation of individual item scores from the mean survey score was graphically depicted for each survey. The mean reading grade level and reading ease estimates for the VFQ-25 and SF-36v2 were 7.8 (fairly easy) and 6.4 (easy), respectively. Both surveys had notable variation in item readability; individual item readability scores ranged from 3.7 to 12.0 (very easy to difficult) for the VFQ-25 and 2.2 to 12.0 (very easy to difficult) for the SF-36v2. Because survey respondents may not comprehend items with readability scores that exceed their reading ability, estimating the readability of each survey item is an important component of evaluating survey readability. Standards for measuring the readability of surveys are needed.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16401705      PMCID: PMC1693909          DOI: 10.1177/1062860605283572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Qual        ISSN: 1062-8606            Impact factor:   1.852


  39 in total

1.  Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish.

Authors:  G K Berland; M N Elliott; L S Morales; J I Algazy; R L Kravitz; M S Broder; D E Kanouse; J A Muñoz; J A Puyol; M Lara; K E Watkins; H Yang; E A McGlynn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001 May 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire.

Authors:  C M Mangione; P P Lee; P R Gutierrez; K Spritzer; S Berry; R D Hays
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-07

3.  An evaluation of validity, reliability, and readability of the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory.

Authors:  B A Macey; C C Bouman
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.210

4.  Communicating with patients who cannot read.

Authors:  B D Weiss; C Coyne
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Patient literacy and the readability of smoking education literature.

Authors:  C D Meade; J C Byrd
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Emergency department patient literacy and the readability of patient-directed materials.

Authors:  R D Powers
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 7.  Strategies to improve cancer education materials.

Authors:  L G Doak; C C Doak; C D Meade
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Development of a questionnaire (OPQ) to assess patient's knowledge about osteoporosis.

Authors:  K C Pande; D de Takats; J A Kanis; V Edwards; P Slade; E V McCloskey
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2000-12-29       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Measuring family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: the development of a questionnaire and preliminary results.

Authors:  D K Heyland; J E Tranmer
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.425

10.  Readability of advance directive documents.

Authors:  B B Ott; T L Hardie
Journal:  Image J Nurs Sch       Date:  1997
View more
  18 in total

1.  Measuring coping in pregnant minority women.

Authors:  Roberta Jeanne Ruiz; Susan Gennaro; Caitlin O'Connor; C Nathan Marti; Amanda Lulloff; Tayra Keshinover; Anne Gibeau; Bernadette Melnyk
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  A comparison of two educational methods on immigrant Latinas breast cancer knowledge and screening behaviors.

Authors:  José Luis Calderón; Mohsen Bazargan; Nisaratana Sangasubana; Ron D Hays; Patrick Hardigan; Richard S Baker
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-08

3.  Are patient-reported outcome measures in orthopaedics easily read by patients?

Authors:  Ibraheim El-Daly; Hajir Ibraheim; Karthig Rajakulendran; Paul Culpan; Peter Bates
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Readability and Comprehension of the Geriatric Depression Scale and PROMIS® Physical Function Items in Older African Americans and Latinos.

Authors:  Sylvia H Paz; Loretta Jones; José L Calderón; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Readability and Missing Data Rates in CAHPS 2.0 Medicare Survey in African American and White Medicare Respondents.

Authors:  Fongwa Mn; Setodji Cm; Paz Sh; Morales Ls; Steers Wn; Hays Rd
Journal:  Health Outcomes Res Med       Date:  2010-05-14

6.  Short form development for oral health patient-reported outcome evaluation in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Honghu Liu; Ron Hays; Yan Wang; Marvin Marcus; Carl Maida; Jie Shen; Di Xiong; Steve Lee; Vladimir Spolsky; Ian Coulter; James Crall
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Readability estimates for commonly used health-related quality of life surveys.

Authors:  Sylvia H Paz; Honghu Liu; Marie N Fongwa; Leo S Morales; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Readability Assessment of Commonly Used German Urological Questionnaires.

Authors:  Pavel Lyatoshinsky; Manolis Pratsinis; Dominik Abt; Hans-Peter Schmid; Valentin Zumstein; Patrick Betschart
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2019-10-01

9.  A crossed-disciplinary evaluation of parental perceptions surrounding pediatric non-invasive brain stimulation research.

Authors:  Michael Behan; Tanjila Nawshin; Samuel Nemanich; Jesse Kowalski; Ellen Sutter; Sunday Francis; Janet Dubinsky; Rebecca Freese; Kyle Rudser; Bernadette Gillick
Journal:  Int J Pharm Healthc Mark       Date:  2020-08-31

Review 10.  A Scoping Review of Nature, Land, and Environmental Connectedness and Relatedness.

Authors:  Samantha Keaulana; Melissa Kahili-Heede; Lorinda Riley; Mei Linn N Park; Kuaiwi Laka Makua; Jetney Kahaulahilahi Vegas; Mapuana C K Antonio
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.