Literature DB >> 8446436

Spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome.

Christian De La Porte1, Erik Van de Keift.   

Abstract

We have reviewed our experience with spinal cord stimulation in treating patients with the failed back surgery syndrome and have assessed patient and patient-selection characteristics as predictors of the long-term outcome. Neuroradiological investigations eliminated the possibility of a surgically treatable lesion and electromyogram assessed the chronic radicular suffering in correlation with the complaints and the clinical examination of the patient. Excellent pain relief (75% or more) during 1 week of trial stimulation and no major psychiatric or psychological pathology were criteria of selection. Seventy-eight patients underwent trial stimulation. Fourteen (18%) failed to obtain excellent pain relief during 1 week of stimulation and their electrodes were removed. The remaining 64 underwent an internalization of the system and they were followed by a clinical observation every 3 months and this for a mean follow-up period of 4 years (range: 1-7 years). Thirty-five patients (55%) continued to experience at least 50% of pain relief at the latest follow-up. Fifty-eight patients (90%) were able to reduce their medication, 39 patients (61%) reported a change in lifestyle, in that their ability to perform daily activities had improved significantly. Fifty-three patients (83%) continued to use their device at the latest follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8446436     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90113-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  12 in total

Review 1.  Neuromodulation: spinal cord and peripheral nerve stimulation.

Authors:  M Day
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Spinal cord stimulation in cluster headache.

Authors:  Tilman Wolter; Holger Kaube
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2013-04

Review 3.  Stimulation methods for neuropathic pain control.

Authors:  M P Stojanovic
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2001-04

4.  Interventional pain medicine: retreat from the biopsychosocial model of pain.

Authors:  Randy S Roth; Michael E Geisser; David A Williams
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Evaluation of Sagittal Spinopelvic Balance in Spinal Cord Stimulator Patients.

Authors:  Royce W Woodroffe; Eli A Perez; Scott C Seaman; Brian J Park; Russ P Nockels; Matthew A Howard; Saul Wilson
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-06-09

6.  Long-term pain relief during spinal cord stimulation. The effect of patient selection.

Authors:  E Van de Kelft; C De La Porte
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Outcomes of spinal cord stimulation: patient validation.

Authors:  Valerie C Anderson; Christina Carlson; Deborah Shatin
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2001-01

Review 8.  Current and future trends in spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain.

Authors:  T R Deer
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2001-12

9.  Evaluation of Sagittal Spinopelvic Balance in Spinal Cord Stimulator Patients.

Authors:  Royce W Woodroffe; Eli A Perez; Scott C Seaman; Brian J Park; Russ P Nockels; Matthew A Howard; Saul Wilson
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-06-09

10.  Spinal cord stimulation: panacea for incurable diseases?

Authors:  Jae Hang Shim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.