Literature DB >> 11252147

Stimulation methods for neuropathic pain control.

M P Stojanovic1.   

Abstract

Neurostimulation methods for control of chronic neuropathic pain have recently gained in popularity. The reasons for this are multifactorial. As opposed to nerve ablation, these methods are minimally invasive and reversible. The improvements in hardware design simplified implantation techniques and prolonged equipment longevity. Stimulation trials have become less invasive, allowing patients to test its effects before final implantation. Finally, the scientific evidence has shown good outcomes of neurostimulation methods for chronic neuropathic pain control. Recent research efforts have revealed new potential mechanisms of action of neurostimulation. Whereas its action was widely explained by gate control theory in the past, it seems that neuromodulation acts also by modulation of neurotransmitters in the central nervous system. Three neurostimulation methods are currently used in clinical practice: spinal cord stimulation (SCS), peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS). The SCS and PNS are excellent treatment choices for certain forms of neuropathic pain. The new indications for SCS are end-stage peripheral vascular disease and ischemic heart disease, whereas PNS is used for the treatment of occipital neuralgia and chronic pelvic pain. DBS is reserved for carefully selected patients in whom the other treatment modalities have failed. In a minority of patients the "tolerance" to neurostimulation develops after long-term use. Further research is needed to establish better outcome predictors to neurostimulation and possibly improve patient selection criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11252147     DOI: 10.1007/s11916-001-0081-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep        ISSN: 1534-3081


  68 in total

1.  Prospective outcome evaluation of spinal cord stimulation in patients with intractable leg pain.

Authors:  D D Ohnmeiss; R F Rashbaum; G M Bogdanffy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Spinal cord stimulation in peripheral arterial disease. A cooperative study.

Authors:  J Broseta; J Barberá; J A de Vera; J L Barcia-Salorio; G Garcia-March; J González-Darder; F Rovaina; V Joanes
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Local analgesia from percutaneous electrical stimulation. A peripheral mechanism.

Authors:  J N Campbell; A Taub
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1973-05

4.  Electrical stimulation versus coronary artery bypass surgery in severe angina pectoris: the ESBY study.

Authors:  C Mannheimer; T Eliasson; L E Augustinsson; C Blomstrand; H Emanuelsson; S Larsson; H Norrsell; A Hjalmarsson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-03-31       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Improvement of limb circulation in peripheral vascular disease using epidural spinal cord stimulation: a prospective study.

Authors:  K Kumar; C Toth; R K Nath; A K Verma; J J Burgess
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Epidural spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic pain--some predictors of success. A 15-year experience.

Authors:  K Kumar; C Toth; R K Nath; P Laing
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1998-08

7.  Spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  Christian De La Porte; Erik Van de Keift
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Spinal cord stimulation for chronic low back pain: a systematic literature synthesis.

Authors:  J A Turner; J D Loeser; K G Bell
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Treatment of chronic pain by epidural spinal cord stimulation: a 10-year experience.

Authors:  K Kumar; R Nath; G M Wyant
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Spinal Cord Stimulation for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome I [RSD]: a Retrospective Multicenter Experience from 1995 to 1998 of 101 Patients.

Authors:  D S Bennett; K M Aló; J Oakley; C A Feler
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  1999-07
View more
  6 in total

1.  Failed back surgery syndrome: a suggested algorithm of care.

Authors:  Praveen Ganty; Manohar Sharma
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2012-11

Review 2.  Neuropathic pain and deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Erlick A C Pereira; Tipu Z Aziz
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  [Chronic pelvic pain syndrome: neurostimulation, neuromodulation and acupuncture].

Authors:  M Walter; U Sammer; T M Kessler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Cervicogenic headache: interventional, anesthetic, and ablative treatment.

Authors:  Steven B Silverman
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2002-08

Review 5.  Spinal cord stimulation: principles of past, present and future practice: a review.

Authors:  Sreekumar Kunnumpurath; Ravi Srinivasagopalan; Nalini Vadivelu
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Scrambler therapy for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain: A case report.

Authors:  Yeon Sil Lee; Min Ki Park; Hahck Soo Park; Won-Joong Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.