Literature DB >> 22151566

Outcomes of spinal cord stimulation: patient validation.

Valerie C Anderson1, Christina Carlson1, Deborah Shatin1.   

Abstract

Objective. To identify aspects of daily life that have been most affected by chronic low back pain among spinal cord stimulation (SCS) patients and to determine the relative contribution that improvement in each would make to patients' quality of life (QOL). Materials and Methods. Telephone survey of 44 patients with chronic low back pain who were about to undergo or had been recently implanted with an SCS system. Patients were asked to define, by open-ended response and examiner-read list, those aspects of daily life that had been most affected by pain and to assess the relative importance that improvement in each would make to daily life. Results. Patients identified 13 areas of daily function that were most significantly impacted by chronic low back pain. Most frequently, activities of daily living, decreased ability to work, psychological changes, and limitations to social life and recreation were identified. Functional status change, decreased ability to walk, and ability to perform daily household activities were rated as the most important change from among items included in examiner-read list. Conclusions. Patients with chronic low back pain seek improvement in multiple dimensions of QOL after SCS, particularly increased physical activity, social relations, work status, and mood. It is likely that patients' assessment of SCS "success" correlates highly with functional improvement. As such, an understanding of SCS therapeutic benefit and satisfaction requires that QOL be carefully assessed in future outcome trials.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 22151566     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1403.2001.00011.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  19 in total

1.  Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures.

Authors:  M P Jensen; J A Turner; J M Romano; L D Fisher
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Paul Karoly; Sanford Braver
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 3.  Neglected topics in chronic pain treatment outcome studies: determination of success.

Authors:  Dennis C Turk; Thomas E Rudy; Bruce A Sorkin
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; J Couper; J B Davies; J P O'Brien
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.358

5.  The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods.

Authors:  Ronald Melzack
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Prospective, multicenter study of spinal cord stimulation for relief of chronic back and extremity pain.

Authors:  K J Burchiel; V C Anderson; F D Brown; R G Fessler; W A Friedman; S Pelofsky; R L Weiner; J Oakley; D Shatin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A multi-center evaluation of the McGill Pain Questionnaire: results from more than 1700 chronic pain patients.

Authors:  Kenneth A Holroyd; Jeffrey E Holm; Francis J Keefe; Judith A Turner; Laurence A Bradley; William D Murphy; Patrick Johnson; Karen Anderson; Andrew L Hinkle; Brian W O'Malley
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 8.  Spinal cord stimulation for chronic, intractable pain: experience over two decades.

Authors:  R B North; D H Kidd; M Zahurak; C S James; D M Long
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  The sickness impact profile: a global measure of disability in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Michael J Follick; Timothy W Smith; David K Ahern
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Spinal cord stimulation in Belgium: a nation-wide survey on the incidence, indications and therapeutic efficacy by the health insurer.

Authors:  R C Kupers; R Van den Oever; B Van Houdenhove; W Vanmechelen; B Hepp; B Nuttin; J M Gybels
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  2 in total

1.  Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain: Prospective Case Series With 1 Year of Sustained Relief Following Short-Term Implant.

Authors:  Christopher A Gilmore; Leonardo Kapural; Meredith J McGee; Joseph W Boggs
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation of the Medial Branch Nerves for the Treatment of Chronic Axial Back Pain in Patients After Radiofrequency Ablation.

Authors:  Timothy R Deer; Christopher A Gilmore; Mehul J Desai; Sean C Li; Michael J DePalma; Thomas J Hopkins; Abram H Burgher; David A Spinner; Steven P Cohen; Meredith J McGee; Joseph W Boggs
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.750

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.