Literature DB >> 8142944

Long-term pain relief during spinal cord stimulation. The effect of patient selection.

E Van de Kelft1, C De La Porte.   

Abstract

We reviewed our experience with spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in treating 116 patients with pain in one or both legs. All these patients were selected for an initial week of trial stimulation by the criteria: pain due to a known benign organic cause, failure of conventional pain control methods and absence of major personality disorders. Selected patients included 78 with the Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS), in whom proven correlation existed between the clinical picture and the neuroradiological and electromyogram abnormalities. Eighty-four out of 116 selected patients underwent definitive SCS implantation after 1 week of trial stimulation with excellent results (more than 75% pain relief). They were followed clinically every 3 months for a mean follow-up period of 47 months. Forty-five patients (54%) continued to experience at least 50% of pain relief at the latest follow up. Seventy-seven patients (91%) were able to reduce their medication intake and 50 patients (60%) reported an improvement in lifestyle. FBSS patients responded more positively to the trial stimulation than the other patients. However, the later outcome was not affected by patient selection as long-term benefit was similar in all definitive SCS patients irrespective of aetiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8142944     DOI: 10.1007/bf00647845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  18 in total

1.  A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.

Authors:  D P CROWNE; D MARLOWE
Journal:  J Consult Psychol       Date:  1960-08

Review 2.  Spinal cord stimulation: a contemporary series.

Authors:  R Spiegelmann; W A Friedman
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 3.  Deep brain stimulation: a review of basic research and clinical studies.

Authors:  Gary H Duncan; Catherine M Bushnell; Serge Marchand
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Percutaneous dorsal column stimulator for chronic pain control.

Authors:  G B Racz; R F McCarron; P Talboys
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Paul Karoly; Sanford Braver
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Electrical stimulation of the spinal cord: a further analysis relating to anatomical factors and tissue properties.

Authors:  W K Sin; B Coburn
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Experience with dorsal column stimulation for relief of chronic intractable pain: 1968-1973.

Authors:  K D Nielson; J E Adams; Y Hosobuchi
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1975-07

8.  Spinal cord stimulation in management of chronic pain. A 9-year experience.

Authors:  M Meglio; B Cioni; G F Rossi
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Causes of failure of surgery on the lumbar spine.

Authors:  C V Burton; W H Kirkaldy-Willis; K Yong-Hing; K B Heithoff
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  Christian De La Porte; Erik Van de Keift
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.961

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.