Literature DB >> 8438532

A review of the physical properties and biological effects of the high amplitude acoustic field used in extracorporeal lithotripsy.

A J Coleman1, J E Saunders.   

Abstract

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) has now been used for more than a decade in the treatment of urinary stone disease. During this period there has been a wide range of studies on the physical properties of the high-amplitude focussed fields used in ESWL and the biological effects of exposure to such fields, including their ability to fragment hard concretions. These studies form a distinct body of knowledge whose relevance to the broader literature on biological effects from lower amplitude exposures has yet to be fully evaluated. This review attempts to present the main results of biological-effects studies in ESWL along with what is known of the physical properties of lithotripsy fields with the aim of assisting this evaluation. In general, the reported biological effects of lithotripsy fields are compatible with those that have been observed at those lower amplitudes of focussed pulsed ultrasound in which transient cavitation is the dominant mechanism of interaction. The relatively large amplitudes and low frequencies in ESWL, however, make it a more potent generator of transient cavitation than most other forms of medical ultrasound. Biological-effects studies with lithotripsy fields may, therefore, be expected to extend our understanding of the nature of transient cavitation and, in particular, its effects in mammalian tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8438532     DOI: 10.1016/0041-624x(93)90037-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  19 in total

Review 1.  Section 8--clinical relevance. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 2.  Section 6--mechanical bioeffects in the presence of gas-carrier ultrasound contrast agents. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  Section 7--discussion of the mechanical index and other exposure parameters. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Section 4--bioeffects in tissues with gas bodies. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Cell loading with laser-generated stress waves: the role of the stress gradient.

Authors:  S E Mulholland; S Lee; D J McAuliffe; A G Doukas
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Cytoplasmic molecular delivery with shock waves: importance of impulse.

Authors:  T Kodama; M R Hamblin; A G Doukas
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Interactions of inertial cavitation bubbles with stratum corneum lipid bilayers during low-frequency sonophoresis.

Authors:  Ahmet Tezel; Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion.

Authors:  Zhen Xu; Achiau Ludomirsky; Lucy Y Eun; Timothy L Hall; Binh C Tran; J Brian Fowlkes; Charles A Cain
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  High strain rate testing of kidney stones.

Authors:  E T Sylven; S Agarwal; C L Briant; R O Cleveland
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Tensile, flexural and compressive strength studies on natural and artificial phosphate urinary stones.

Authors:  A Mohamed Ali; N Arunai Nambi Raj
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2008-11-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.