Literature DB >> 8431968

Pharmacokinetics of etoposide: correlation of pharmacokinetic parameters with clinical conditions.

K H Pflüger1, M Hahn, J B Holz, L Schmidt, P Köhl, H W Fritsch, H Jungclas, K Havemann.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetic parameters of etoposide were established in 35 patients receiving the drug parenterally within the framework of different polychemotherapy protocols. A total of 62 data for 24-h kinetics were analysed. After sample extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or thin-layer chromatographic (TLC) separation, etoposide was measured by means of [252Cf]-plasma desorption mass spectrometry (PDMS). This highly specific detection system proved to be very practicable and reproducible. The present study comprised two parts that were absolutely comparable in terms of clinical and pharmacokinetic parameters. In part II of the study, sensitivity was improved by modifying the analytical technique. After the exclusion of patients who had previously been given cisplatin or who exhibited renal impairment and of one patient who showed extremely high levels of alkaline phosphatase, gamma-GT and SGPT, the mean values calculated for the pharmacokinetic parameters evaluated were: beta-elimination half-life (t 1/2 beta), 4.9 +/- 1.2 h; mean residence time (MRT), 6.7 +/- 1.4 h; area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), 5.43 +/- 1.74 mg min ml-1; volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss), 6.8 +/- 2.7 l/m2; and clearance (Cl), 18.8 +/- 5.3 ml min-1 m-2. The pharmacokinetic parameters were correlated with 12 different demographic or biochemical conditions. Impaired renal function, previous application of cisplatin and the age of patients were found to influence etoposide disposition to a statistically significant extent. We suggest that the dose of etoposide should be reduced in elderly patients and/or in individuals with impaired renal function, especially in those exhibiting general risk factors such as reduced liver function with regard to the polychemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8431968     DOI: 10.1007/bf00686147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of the human pharmacokinetics of VM-26 and VP-16, two antineoplastic epipodophyllotixin glucopyranoside derivatives.

Authors:  L M Allen; P J Creaven
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Clinical pharmacology of high-dose etoposide associated with cisplatin. Pharmacokinetic and metabolic studies.

Authors:  A Gouyette; A Deniel; J L Pico; J P Droz; D Baume; M Ostronoff; N le Bail; M Hayat
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-11

3.  Drug monitoring of etoposide (VP16-213). I. A combined method of liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  H Danigel; K H Pflüger; H Jungclas; L Schmidt; J Dellbrügge
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Carboplatin and etoposide pharmacokinetics in patients with testicular teratoma.

Authors:  D R Newell; R A Eeles; L A Gumbrell; F E Boxall; A Horwich; A H Calvert
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 5.  The clinical pharmacology of VM26 and VP16-213. A brief overview.

Authors:  P J Creaven
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Pharmacokinetics of etoposide in gestochoriocarcinoma.

Authors:  M D'Incalci; C Sessa; C Rossi; G Roviaro; C Mangioni
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1985-01

7.  Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of etoposide (VP-16).

Authors:  R D Smyth; M Pfeffer; A Scalzo; R L Comis
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  Pharmacokinetics of Teniposide (VM26) and etoposide (VP16-213) in children with cancer.

Authors:  W E Evans; J A Sinkule; W R Crom; L Dow; A T Look; G Rivera
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  Teniposide (VM26) disposition in children with leukemia.

Authors:  J A Sinkule; C F Stewart; W R Crom; E T Melton; G V Dahl; W E Evans
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Penetration of VP-16 (etoposide) into human intracerebral and extracerebral tumors.

Authors:  D J Stewart; M T Richard; H Hugenholtz; J M Dennery; R Belanger; J Gerin-Lajoie; V Montpetit; D Nundy; J Prior; H S Hopkins
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.130

View more
  11 in total

1.  Analysis of thrombocytopenia due to carboplatin combined with etoposide in elderly patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  K Shibata; Y Nakatsumi; K Kasahara; T Bando; M Fujimura; T Matsuda
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Randomized cross-over clinical trial to study potential pharmacokinetic interactions between cisplatin or carboplatin and etoposide.

Authors:  Huw D Thomas; David J Porter; Imke Bartelink; Joy R Nobbs; Michael Cole; Suzie Elliott; David R Newell; A Hilary Calvert; Martin Highley; Alan V Boddy
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Drug dosage in the elderly. Is it rational?

Authors:  K Turnheim
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide.

Authors:  Giuseppe Toffoli; Giuseppe Corona; Barbara Basso; Mauro Boiocchi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Phase I escalation of gemcitabine combined with protracted oral etoposide in gynecologic malignancies: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Agustin A Garcia; Michael A Bookman; Lorna Rodriguez-Rodriguez; David G Mutch; Katherine Y Look
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 6.  Practical treatment guide for dose individualisation in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  P Canal; E Chatelut; S Guichard
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Use of etoposide in patients with organ dysfunction: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations.

Authors:  C F Stewart
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide.

Authors:  R S de Jong; N H Mulder; D R Uges; S Kaul; B Winograd; H J Groen; P H Willemse; W T van der Graaf; E G de Vries
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Estimation of glomerular filtration rate in cancer patients.

Authors:  J G Wright; A V Boddy; M Highley; J Fenwick; A McGill; A H Calvert
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  A study of the feasibility and accuracy of pharmacokinetically guided etoposide dosing in children.

Authors:  S P Lowis; L Price; A D Pearson; D R Newell; M Cole
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.