Literature DB >> 17220774

Reading with optical magnifiers: page navigation strategies and difficulties.

Alex Bowers1, Allen M Y Cheong, Jan E Lovie-Kitchin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To read efficiently with a simple hand or stand magnifier, people with visual impairment have to move (navigate) the device along each line (forward phase) and back to the correct position at the start of the next line (retrace phase). Page navigation difficulties have been implicated as limiting factors when reading with hand and stand magnifiers, but have not been objectively measured.
METHODS: Magnifier movements were recorded using a 3SPACE Isotrak system for 43 participants with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who read two short stories using their habitual hand or stand magnifier. Page navigation was quantified in terms of magnifier movements and navigation errors for the forward and retrace phases. Visual acuities and visual fields were measured, and magnifier usage and page navigation difficulties were surveyed.
RESULTS: During the forward phase, participants primarily used either a straight (47%) or diagonal downward (46%) movement, whereas during the retrace phase, the majority (56%) used a downward movement. On average, forward navigation time was four times longer than retrace navigation time (p<0.001). The most common navigation error was incorrect positioning of the magnifier at the end of the retrace movement. Near word acuity correlated strongly with forward time (r=0.78), and moderately with retrace time (r=0.53) and forward errors (r=0.50). Vertical field of view correlated with retrace errors (r=-0.53). Participants' estimates of page navigation difficulties were not predictive of objective measures of performance.
CONCLUSIONS: We quantified page navigation strategies and difficulties of people with AMD reading with magnifiers. Retrace, which presents the most common difficulty, is not well predicted by vision measures or magnifier characteristics; future studies should investigate the relationship between motor skills and navigation performance, and the impact of training or devices on reducing retrace navigation difficulties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17220774      PMCID: PMC1866364          DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000254035.39055.05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  14 in total

1.  Evaluating the outcomes of low vision rehabilitation.

Authors:  R Harper; K Doorduyn; B Reeves; L Slater
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  New design principles for visual acuity letter charts.

Authors:  I L Bailey; J E Lovie
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1976-11

Review 3.  Reading with magnifiers.

Authors:  B P Den Brinker; P J Beek
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  On the use of hand-held magnifiers during reading.

Authors:  J J Neve
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  The experience of a university-based low vision clinic.

Authors:  S J Leat; N J Rumney
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Printed cards for measuring low-vision reading speed.

Authors:  S J Ahn; G E Legge; A Luebker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The design and use of a new near-vision chart.

Authors:  I L Bailey; J E Lovie
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1980-06

8.  Does a line guide improve reading performance with stand magnifiers?

Authors:  Allen M Y Cheong; Alex R Bowers; Jan E Lovie-Kitchin
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Comparison of subjective ratings of function with observed functional ability of frail older persons.

Authors:  J T Elam; M J Graney; T Beaver; D el Derwi; W B Applegate; S T Miller
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 10.  Low vision magnifiers--their optical parameters and methods for prescribing.

Authors:  I L Bailey; M A Bullimore; R B Greer; W B Mattingly
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  3 in total

1.  Development of a Reading Accessibility Index Using the MNREAD Acuity Chart.

Authors:  Aurélie Calabrèse; Cynthia Owsley; Gerald McGwin; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  Visual, Musculoskeletal, and Balance Complaints in AMD: A Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Christina Zetterlund; Hans Olof Richter; Lars-Olov Lundqvist
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Tuneable Liquid Crystal Micro-Lens Array for Image Contrast Enhancement in a Pixelated Thin Film Photo-Transistor Flat Panel Imager.

Authors:  Kun Li; Daping Chu; Jiaqi Chu; Shuhei Kitajima; Tokiyoshi Matsuda; Mutsu Kimura
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 2.891

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.