Literature DB >> 7498229

Optimum tomographic reconstruction parameters for HMPAO brain SPET imaging: a practical approach based on subjective and objective indexes.

P O Kotzki1, D Mariano-Goulart, M Quiquere, F Lyonnet, M Zanca, M Rossi.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to define an optimal strategy for the tomographic reconstruction procedure in routine brain single-photon emission tomography (SPET) studies, including the number of projections, filter function and matrix size. A set of projection data with different count densities was obtained from a technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime (99mTc-HMPAO) brain SPET acquisition from one volunteer. The projections were reconstructed with different filters and the quality of the reconstructed images was determined using both a subjective observer rating score and the Gilbert index. For each count density, the observers' choice corresponded to images with the lowest Gilbert index. The noise level in brain SPET sections was estimated and correlated with the fractal dimension. The results of this study indicate that although noise represents a fundamental component of brain SPET imaging, image quality also depends on the reconstructed spatial resolution. Image quality is satisfactorily described by fractal dimension. In addition the optimal filter function depends on the available count density. For high count levels, optimal reconstruction may be obtained by using a high-resolution matrix and a slightly smoother reconstruction filter. When count densities are low, best results are obtained by using a low-resolution matrix and a sharper filter. Finally, this study suggests that image quality is not influenced by the number of projections for equivalent count densities. These results were confirmed by 30 HMPAO brain SPET studies acquired in a routine clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7498229     DOI: 10.1007/bf01254569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  19 in total

1.  Sensitivity, resolution and image quality with a multi-head SPECT camera.

Authors:  F H Fahey; B A Harkness; J W Keyes; M T Madsen; C Battisti; V Zito
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  An estimation of noise levels in HMPAO RCBF SPECT images using simulation and phantom data; comparison with results obtained from repeated normal controls.

Authors:  A S Houston; P M Kemp; P T Griffiths; M A MacLeod
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  The effects of a finite number of projection angles and finite lateral sampling of projections on the propagation of statistical errors in transverse section reconstruction.

Authors:  R H Huesman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Effect of spatial resolution on SPECT quantification values.

Authors:  A Kojima; M Matsumoto; M Takahashi; Y Hirota; H Yoshida
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Enhancement of SPECT images by Fourier filtering the projection image set.

Authors:  M T Madsen; C H Park
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Variation of the count-dependent Metz filter with imaging system modulation transfer function.

Authors:  M A King; R B Schwinger; B C Penney
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Determination of the optimum filter function for SPECT imaging.

Authors:  D R Gilland; B M Tsui; W H McCartney; J R Perry; J Berg
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Iterative methods for the three-dimensional reconstruction of an object from projections.

Authors:  P Gilbert
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  SNR and noise measurements for medical imaging: I. A practical approach based on statistical decision theory.

Authors:  M J Tapiovaara; R F Wagner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Quantitative SPECT reconstruction of iodine-123 data.

Authors:  D R Gilland; R J Jaszczak; K L Greer; R E Coleman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.