Literature DB >> 18765887

Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: noise reduction techniques.

S Cheenu Kappadath1, Chris C Shaw.   

Abstract

We have previously developed a dual-energy digital mammography (DEDM) technique for calcification imaging under full-field imaging conditions using a commercially available flat-panel based digital mammography system. Although dual-energy (DE) imaging could suppress the obscuration of calcifications by tissue-structure background, it also increases the intrinsic noise in the DE images. Here we report on the effects of three different noise reduction techniques on DE calcification images: a simple smoothing (boxcar) filter applied to the DE image, a median filter applied to the HE image prior to the computation of the DE image and an adaptation of the Kalender's correlated-noise reduction (KNR) technique for DEDM. We compared the different noise reduction techniques by evaluating their effects on DE calcification images of a 5 cm thick breast-tissue-equivalent slab with continuously varying glandular-tissue ratio superimposed with calcium carbonate crystals of various sizes that simulate calcifications. Evaluations of different noise reducing techniques were performed by comparison of the root-mean-square signal in background regions (no calcifications present) of the DE calcification images and the contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) of the calcifications in the DE calcification images. Amongst the different noise reduction techniques evaluated in this study, the KNR method was found to be most effective in reducing the image noise and increasing the calcification visibility (or CNR), closely followed by the HE median filter technique. Although the simple smoothing (boxcar) filter reduced the noise, it did not improve calcification visibility. The visible calcification threshold size with DEDM over smoothly varying background at screening mammography doses, assuming a CNR threshold of 4, was estimated to be around 250 microm with both the HE median filter and the KNR techniques. The quality of DE images with noise reduction techniques based on phantom studies were verified with DE images of an animal-tissue phantom that consisted of calcifications superimposed over more realistic tissue structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18765887      PMCID: PMC2858626          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/19/010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  27 in total

1.  An algorithm for noise suppression in dual energy CT material density images.

Authors:  W A Kalender; E Klotz; L Kostaridou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Single-exposure dual-energy computed radiography: improved detection and processing.

Authors:  D L Ergun; C A Mistretta; D E Brown; R T Bystrianyk; W K Sze; F Kelcz; D P Naidich
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Dual-energy x-ray projection imaging: two sampling schemes for the correction of scattered radiation.

Authors:  F C Wagner; A Macovski; D G Nishimura
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Theoretical optimization of a split septaless xenon ionization detector for dual-energy chest radiography.

Authors:  H N Cardinal; A Fenster
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  SNR and noise measurements for medical imaging: I. A practical approach based on statistical decision theory.

Authors:  M J Tapiovaara; R F Wagner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Improvement of detection in computed radiography by new single-exposure dual-energy subtraction.

Authors:  W Ito; K Shimura; N Nakajima; M Ishida; H Kato
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography with an iterative noise-reduction algorithm.

Authors:  S Kido; J Ikezoe; H Naito; J Arisawa; S Tamura; T Kozuka; W Ito; K Shimura; H Kato
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Mammographic detectability of breast microcalcifications.

Authors:  E A Sickles
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  A method for selective tissue and bone visualization using dual energy scanned projection radiography.

Authors:  W R Brody; G Butt; A Hall; A Macovski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1981 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Generalized image combinations in dual KVP digital radiography.

Authors:  L A Lehmann; R E Alvarez; A Macovski; W R Brody; N J Pelc; S J Riederer; A L Hall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1981 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  4 in total

1.  Energy weighting improves dose efficiency in clinical practice: implementation on a spectral photon-counting mammography system.

Authors:  Johan Berglund; Henrik Johansson; Mats Lundqvist; Björn Cederström; Erik Fredenberg
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-08-28

2.  Classification of breast microcalcifications using dual-energy mammography.

Authors:  Bahaa Ghammraoui; Andrey Makeev; Ahmed Zidan; Alaadin Alayoubi; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-03-12

3.  A modified undecimated discrete wavelet transform based approach to mammographic image denoising.

Authors:  Eri Matsuyama; Du-Yih Tsai; Yongbum Lee; Masaki Tsurumaki; Noriyuki Takahashi; Haruyuki Watanabe; Hsian-Min Chen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Compositional breast imaging using a dual-energy mammography protocol.

Authors:  Aurelie D Laidevant; Serghei Malkov; Chris I Flowers; Karla Kerlikowske; John A Shepherd
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.