Literature DB >> 8425338

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A multicenter investigation with long-term follow-up evaluation.

D A Heck1, L Marmor, A Gibson, B T Rougraff.   

Abstract

Nonmental-backed, cemented, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has a survivorship rate in this multicenter investigation at ten years of 91.4% (+/- 2.8). High levels of patient weight were associated with increased need for revision arthroplasty. Overall, men had a lower revision rate (2.4%) compared with women (3.9%). Valgus postoperative alignment was minimally associated with progression of disease as a cause for revision. No difference in revision rates between medial and lateral compartmental arthroplasty was noted. The theoretical clinical benefits of the use of metal-backed tibial components will need to be reevaluated in light of these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8425338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  28 in total

1.  The impact of a high tibial valgus osteotomy and unicondylar medial arthroplasty on the treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gunter Spahn; Gunther O Hofmann; Lars Victor von Engelhardt; Mengxia Li; Henning Neubauer; Hans Michael Klinger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement with a nonimage-based navigation system.

Authors:  L Perlick; H Bäthis; M Tingart; C Perlick; C Lüring; J Grifka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  How to read a postoperative knee replacement radiograph.

Authors:  Nawfal Al-Hadithy; Madhavan C Papanna; Sana Farooq; Yegappan Kalairajah
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Unicompartmental knee replacements with Miller-Galante prosthesis: two to 16-year follow-up of a single surgeon series.

Authors:  Joby John; C Mauffrey; Peter May
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  High degree of accuracy of a novel image-free handheld robot for unicondylar knee arthroplasty in a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Jess H Lonner; Julie R Smith; Frederic Picard; Brian Hamlin; Philip J Rowe; Philip E Riches
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Body mass index changes after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty do not adversely influence patient outcomes.

Authors:  Zhan Xia; Ming Han Lincoln Liow; Graham Seow-Hng Goh; Hwei Chi Chong; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  [Implant with a mobile or a fixed bearing in unicompartmental knee joint replacemen].

Authors:  G Matziolis; S Tohtz; B Gengenbach; C Perka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty: Which type of artificial joint do patients forget?

Authors:  Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Jelle P van der List; Saker Khamaisy; Danyal H Nawabi; Ran Thein; C Ishmael; Sophia Paul; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  A systematic approach to predicting the risk of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revision.

Authors:  G Zhang; B P Smith; J F Plate; R Casanova; F-C Hsu; J Li; L Xia; K C Li; G G Poehling; X Zhou
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Mid-term results and factors affecting outcome of a metal-backed unicompartmental knee design: a case series.

Authors:  Thorsten M Seyler; Michael A Mont; Lawrence P Lai; Jipan Xie; David R Marker; Michael G Zywiel; Peter M Bonutti
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.