Literature DB >> 28879594

Body mass index changes after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty do not adversely influence patient outcomes.

Zhan Xia1, Ming Han Lincoln Liow2, Graham Seow-Hng Goh2, Hwei Chi Chong2, Ngai Nung Lo2, Seng Jin Yeo2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of patients who lost or gained weight following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), the effect of post-operative body mass index (BMI) changes on functional outcomes and quality of life (QoL), and predictive factors associated with BMI changes.
METHODS: Prospectively collected data of 1043 patients who underwent UKA between 2000 and 2014 were reviewed. BMI, Knee Society Knee Score and Function Score, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score and proportion of patients attaining OKS/SF-36 minimal clinically important differences (MCID) were recorded preoperatively and at 2 years post-operatively. The patients were stratified into three groups based on weight changes for further analysis.
RESULTS: Following UKA, 138 (13.3%) patients had lost weight, 695 (66.6%) maintained their weight, and 210 (20.1%) gained weight. Patients in all groups demonstrated significant improvements in functional and SF-36 PCS scores at 2 years post-operatively. There were no significant differences in functional outcomes, QoL or revision rate between the groups. Post-operative BMI changes were not correlated with any outcome scores or attainment of MCID (n.s.).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that evaluates change in BMI following UKA. It demonstrated a higher proportion of patients who gained weight as compared to those who lost weight. Post-operative BMI changes did not appear to affect outcomes of UKA. These findings will provide important information to surgeons when counselling patients regarding BMI change and its effect on outcomes after UKA. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body mass index; Functional outcomes; Quality of life; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28879594     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4703-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  45 in total

1.  Effect of body mass index on range of motion and manipulation after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Naomi E Gadinsky; Jessica K Ehrhardt; Christopher Urband; Geoffrey H Westrich
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Comparison of Outcome and Survival After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Between Navigation and Conventional Techniques With an Average 9-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Eun Kyoo Song; Mohite N; Seung-Hun Lee; Bo-Ram Na; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Association of body mass index and clinical outcome 2 years after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Carl Neuerburg; Gian M Salzmann; Monika Kriner; Fabian von Knoch; Stefan Preiss; Tomas Drobny; Urs Munzinger
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores.

Authors:  D W Murray; R Fitzpatrick; K Rogers; H Pandit; D J Beard; A J Carr; J Dawson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-08

5.  Weight changes after total hip or knee arthroplasty: prevalence, predictors, and effects on outcomes.

Authors:  Michael P Ast; Matthew P Abdel; Yuo-Yu Lee; Stephen Lyman; Allison V Ruel; Geoffrey H Westrich
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Do patients lose weight after joint arthroplasty surgery? A systematic review.

Authors:  Maria C S Inacio; Donna Kritz-Silverstein; Elizabeth W Paxton; Donald C Fithian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Early failure of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with obesity.

Authors:  Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Thomas H Mallory; Joanne B Adams; Kari L Groseth
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Trends in weight change among Canadian adults.

Authors:  Heather M Orpana; Mark S Tremblay; Philippe Finès
Journal:  Health Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.796

9.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: factors influencing the outcome.

Authors:  Zhiqing Xing; Jonathan Katz; William Jiranek
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Body mass index and functional mobility outcome following early rehabilitation after a total knee replacement: a retrospective study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chun-de Liao; Yi-Ching Huang; Li-Fong Lin; Shih-Wei Huang; Tsan-Hon Liou
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.794

View more
  3 in total

1.  Inferior outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty compared with primary total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jin Kyu Lee; Hyun Jung Kim; Jae Ok Park; Jae-Hyuk Yang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  [Research progress in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Dong Wu; Minzhi Yang; Zheng Cao; Xiangpeng Kong; Yi Wang; Renwen Guo; Wei Chai
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-15

3.  [Effect of body mass index on short- and medium-term effectiveness of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Chong Zheng; Weijie Lu; Zhichen Li; Junjie Zhou; Dongfeng Chen; Yingbin Wu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-04-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.