Literature DB >> 8423165

The influence of the biarticularity of the gastrocnemius muscle on vertical-jumping achievement.

A J van Soest1, A L Schwab, M F Bobbert, G J van Ingen Schenau.   

Abstract

Hypotheses concerning the influence of changes in the design of the human musculoskeletal system on performance cannot be tested experimentally. Computer modelling and simulation provide a research methodology that does allow manipulation of the system's design. In the present study this methodology was used to test a recently formulated hypothesis concerning the role of the biarticularity of the gastrocnemius muscle (GAS) in vertical jumping [Bobbert and van Ingen Schenau, J. Biomechanics 21, 249-262 (1988)]. This was done by comparing maximal jump heights for a model equipped with biarticular GAS with a model equipped with a monoarticular GAS. It was found that jump height decreased by 10 mm when GAS was changed into a monoarticular muscle. Thus, the hypothesis formulated by Bobbert was substantiated, although quantitatively the effect is small. Our result differs from that of Pandy and Zajac [J. Biomechanics 24, 1-10 (1991)], who performed similar model calculations. It is shown that the results described by these authors can be explained from the moment-arm-joint-angle relation of GAS at the knee in their model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8423165     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(93)90608-h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  27 in total

1.  Simulation of the complex countermovement jumping by means of a simple four-degrees-of-freedom model.

Authors:  Martin Fritz; Klaus Peikenkamp
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Robust passive dynamics of the musculoskeletal system compensate for unexpected surface changes during human hopping.

Authors:  Marjolein M van der Krogt; Wendy W de Graaf; Claire T Farley; Chet T Moritz; L J Richard Casius; Maarten F Bobbert
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-07-09

3.  Dimensions of forelimb muscles in orangutans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Motoharu Oishi; Naomichi Ogihara; Hideki Endo; Nobutsune Ichihara; Masao Asari
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Control of position and movement is simplified by combined muscle spindle and Golgi tendon organ feedback.

Authors:  Dinant A Kistemaker; Arthur J Knoek Van Soest; Jeremy D Wong; Isaac Kurtzer; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  The use of electromyography for the noninvasive prediction of muscle forces. Current issues.

Authors:  J J Dowling
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  OpenSim: a musculoskeletal modeling and simulation framework for in silico investigations and exchange.

Authors:  Ajay Seth; Michael Sherman; Jeffrey A Reinbolt; Scott L Delp
Journal:  Procedia IUTAM       Date:  2011

7.  The contribution of muscle properties in the control of explosive movements.

Authors:  A J van Soest; M F Bobbert
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Adaptive surrogate modeling for efficient coupling of musculoskeletal control and tissue deformation models.

Authors:  Jason P Halloran; Ahmet Erdemir; Antonie J van den Bogert
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  A mathematical approach to the mechanical capabilities of limbs and fingers.

Authors:  Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Neuromuscular and biomechanical factors codetermine the solution to motor redundancy in rhythmic multijoint arm movement.

Authors:  Aymar de Rugy; Stephan Riek; Yalchin Oytam; Timothy J Carroll; Rahman Davoodi; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.