Literature DB >> 18545990

Neuromuscular and biomechanical factors codetermine the solution to motor redundancy in rhythmic multijoint arm movement.

Aymar de Rugy1, Stephan Riek, Yalchin Oytam, Timothy J Carroll, Rahman Davoodi, Richard G Carson.   

Abstract

How the CNS deals with the issue of motor redundancy remains a central question for motor control research. Here we investigate the means by which neuromuscular and biomechanical factors interact to resolve motor redundancy in rhythmic multijoint arm movements. We used a two-df motorized robot arm to manipulate the dynamics of rhythmic flexion-extension (FE) and supination-pronation (SP) movements at the elbow-joint complex. Participants were required to produce rhythmic FE and SP movements, either in isolation, or in combination (at the phase relationship of their choice), while we recorded the activity of key bi-functional muscles. When performed in combination, most participants spontaneously produced an in-phase pattern of coordination in which flexion is synchronised with supination. The activity of the Biceps Brachii (BB), the strongest arm muscle which also has the largest moment arms in both flexion and supination was significantly higher for FE and SP performed in combination than in isolation, suggesting optimal exploitation of the mechanical advantage of this muscle. In a separate condition, participants were required to produce a rhythmic SP movement while a rhythmic FE movement was imposed by the motorized robot. Simulations based upon a musculoskeletal model of the arm demonstrated that in this context, the most efficient use of the force-velocity relationship of BB requires that an anti-phase pattern of coordination (flexion synchronized with pronation) be produced. In practice, the participants maintained the in-phase behavior, and BB activity was higher than for SP performed in isolation. This finding suggests that the neural organisation underlying the exploitation of bifunctional muscle properties, in the natural context, constrains the system to maintain the "natural" coordination pattern in an altered dynamic environment, even at the cost of reduced biomechanical efficiency. We suggest an important role for afference from the imposed movement in promoting the "natural" pattern. Practical implications for the emerging field of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitation are briefly mentioned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18545990     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1437-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  49 in total

1.  A model of the upper extremity for simulating musculoskeletal surgery and analyzing neuromuscular control.

Authors:  Katherine R S Holzbaur; Wendy M Murray; Scott L Delp
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Neuromuscular adaptation during skill acquisition on a two degree-of-freedom target-acquisition task: isometric torque production.

Authors:  Jonathan Shemmell; Matthew Forner; James R Tresilian; Stephan Riek; Benjamin K Barry; Richard G Carson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Influence of predominant patterns of coordination on the exploitation of interaction torques in a two-joint rhythmic arm movement.

Authors:  Aymar de Rugy; Stephan Riek; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Neuromuscular-skeletal origins of predominant patterns of coordination in rhythmic two-joint arm movement.

Authors:  Aymar de Rugy; Stephan Riek; Richard G Carson
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Inhibitory projection from brachioradialis to biceps brachii motoneurones in human.

Authors:  A Naito; M Shindo; T Miyasaka; Y J Sun; H Morita
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Sensori-sensory afferent conditioning with leg movement: gain control in spinal reflex and ascending paths.

Authors:  J D Brooke; J Cheng; D F Collins; W E McIlroy; J E Misiaszek; W R Staines
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.685

7.  Coordination of mono- and bi-articular muscles in multi-degree of freedom elbow movements.

Authors:  L E Sergio; D J Ostry
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Electromyographic study of the elbow flexors and extensors in a motion of forearm pronation/supination while maintaining elbow flexion in humans.

Authors:  A Naito; Y J Sun; M Yajima; H Fukamachi; K Ushikoshi
Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 9.  Transmission of the cortical command for human voluntary movement through cervical propriospinal premotoneurons.

Authors:  E Pierrot-Deseilligny
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 11.685

10.  Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Leonard E Kahn; Michele L Zygman; W Zev Rymer; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  4 in total

1.  Adaptive and phase transition behavior in performance of discrete multi-articular actions by degenerate neurobiological systems.

Authors:  Robert Rein; Keith Davids; Chris Button
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Force synchrony enhances the stability of rhythmic multi-joint arm coordination.

Authors:  Jelena Stosic; Timothy J Carroll; Aymar de Rugy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Decoding of Motor Coordination Imagery Involving the Lower Limbs by the EEG-Based Brain Network.

Authors:  Yunfa Fu; Zhouzhou Zhou; Anmin Gong; Qian Qian; Lei Su; Lei Zhao
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-23

4.  Are muscle synergies useful for neural control?

Authors:  Aymar de Rugy; Gerald E Loeb; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.380

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.