Literature DB >> 20162465

Simulation of the complex countermovement jumping by means of a simple four-degrees-of-freedom model.

Martin Fritz1, Klaus Peikenkamp.   

Abstract

By means of a four-degrees-of-freedom model the vertical movements of an athlete and the time course of the ground reaction force were simulated during a countermovement jump on a concrete and a wooden surface. The model masses were connected to each other and to the surface by springs and dampers. At first the stiffness of the springs decreased in order to initiate the countermovement. Afterwards the stiffness increased like the muscle activity so that the flexion of the model 'legs' were decelerated before the extension starts. The best result was attained when the stiffness of the spring between the model masses 'thighs' and 'trunk' increased before the other three springs. Compared with the muscle activity this means that for a successful jump the upper body segments have to be accelerated before the segments near to the ground are accelerated. The model 'athlete' was connected to a model of the surface. It could be shown that the jump on a concrete surface results in a better jump height than the jump on an elastic wooden surface if the muscle activation is not adapted to the surface properties.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20162465     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-010-0585-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  11 in total

1.  Simulating the impact during human jumping by means of a 4-degrees-of-freedom model with time-dependent properties.

Authors:  M Fritz; K Peikenkamp
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Interaction between fascicles and tendinous structures during counter movement jumping investigated in vivo.

Authors:  Sadao Kurokawa; Tetsuo Fukunaga; Akinori Nagano; Senshi Fukashiro
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2003-07-18

3.  Force, work and power output of lower limb muscles during human maximal-effort countermovement jumping.

Authors:  Akinori Nagano; Taku Komura; Senshi Fukashiro; Ryutaro Himeno
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.368

4.  Behaviour of triceps surae muscle-tendon complex in different jump conditions.

Authors:  A Gollhofer; V Strojnik; W Rapp; L Schweizer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

5.  An optimal control model for maximum-height human jumping.

Authors:  M G Pandy; F E Zajac; E Sim; W S Levine
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Why is countermovement jump height greater than squat jump height?

Authors:  M F Bobbert; K G Gerritsen; M C Litjens; A J Van Soest
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Coordination in vertical jumping.

Authors:  M F Bobbert; G J van Ingen Schenau
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The influence of the biarticularity of the gastrocnemius muscle on vertical-jumping achievement.

Authors:  A J van Soest; A L Schwab; M F Bobbert; G J van Ingen Schenau
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Storage and utilization of elastic strain energy during jumping.

Authors:  F C Anderson; M G Pandy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Relationships between muscle lactate accumulation and surface EMG activities during isokinetic contractions in man.

Authors:  T Horita; T Ishiko
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1987
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.