Literature DB >> 8417837

Epicardial mapping of ventricular defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in dogs.

X Zhou1, J P Daubert, P D Wolf, W M Smith, R E Ideker.   

Abstract

To study the mechanism of defibrillation and the reason for the increased defibrillation efficacy of biphasic waveforms, the potential gradient in a 32 x 30-mm region of the right ventricle in 15 dogs was progressively lowered in four steps while a strong potential gradient field was maintained throughout the rest of the ventricular myocardium. The volume of right ventricle beneath the plaque was 10 +/- 2% of the total ventricular mass. A 10-msec monophasic (eight dogs) or 5/5-msec biphasic (seven dogs) truncated exponential shock 30% above the defibrillation threshold voltage was given via electrodes on the left ventricular apex and right atrium to create the strong potential gradient field. Simultaneously, a weaker shock with the same waveform but opposite polarity was given via mesh electrodes on either side of the small right ventricular region to cancel part of the potential difference in the region and to create one of the four levels of potential gradient fields. Shock potentials and activations were recorded from 117 epicardial electrodes in the small region, and in one dog global epicardial activations and potentials were recorded from a sock containing 72 electrodes. Each gradient field was tested 10 times for successful defibrillation after 10 seconds of electrically induced fibrillation. For both monophasic and biphasic shocks, the percentage of successful defibrillation attempts decreased (p < 0.05) as the potential gradient decreased in the small region. Defibrillation was successful approximately 80% of the time for a mean +/- SD potential gradient of 5.4 +/- 0.8 V/cm for monophasic shocks and 2.7 +/- 0.3 V/cm for biphasic shocks (p < 0.05). No postshock activation fronts arose from the small region for eight waveform when the gradient was more than 5 V/cm. For both waveforms, the postshock activation fronts after the shocks were markedly different from those just before the shock and exhibited either a focal origin or unidirectional conduction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8417837     DOI: 10.1161/01.res.72.1.145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Res        ISSN: 0009-7330            Impact factor:   17.367


  21 in total

1.  Roles of electric field and fiber structure in cardiac electric stimulation.

Authors:  S B Knisley; N Trayanova; F Aguel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Modeling defibrillation of the heart: approaches and insights.

Authors:  Natalia Trayanova; Jason Constantino; Takashi Ashihara; Gernot Plank
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2011

3.  Transmural and endocardial Purkinje activation in pigs before local myocardial activation after defibrillation shocks.

Authors:  Derek J Dosdall; Kang-An Cheng; Jian Huang; J Scott Allison; James D Allred; William M Smith; Raymond E Ideker
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 6.343

4.  Tunnel propagation of postshock activations as a hypothesis for fibrillation induction and isoelectric window.

Authors:  Takashi Ashihara; Jason Constantino; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Defibrillation efficacy with endocardial electrodes is influenced by reductions in cardiac preload.

Authors:  J S Strobel; G N Kay; G P Walcott; W M Smith; R E Ideker
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  A biophysical model for defibrillation of cardiac tissue.

Authors:  J P Keener; A V Panfilov
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Mechanisms of cardiac cell excitation with premature monophasic and biphasic field stimuli: a model study.

Authors:  M G Fishler; E A Sobie; N V Thakor; L Tung
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  The effect of pinacidil on postshock activation and ventricular defibrillation threshold in canine hearts.

Authors:  Qi Jin; Ning Zhang; Jian Zhou; Chang-jian Lin; Yang Pang; Gang Gu; Wei-feng Shen; Li-Qun Wu
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Transmural recording of shock potential gradient fields, early postshock activations, and refibrillation episodes associated with external defibrillation of long-duration ventricular fibrillation in swine.

Authors:  James D Allred; Cheryl R Killingsworth; J Scott Allison; Derek J Dosdall; Sharon B Melnick; William M Smith; Raymond E Ideker; Gregory P Walcott
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 6.343

10.  High defibrillation threshold: the science, signs and solutions.

Authors:  Sony Jacob; Victorio Pidlaoan; Jaspreet Singh; Aditya Bharadwaj; Mehul B Patel; Antonio Carrillo
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-01-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.