Literature DB >> 10465752

Roles of electric field and fiber structure in cardiac electric stimulation.

S B Knisley1, N Trayanova, F Aguel.   

Abstract

This study investigated roles of the variation of extracellular voltage gradient (VG) over space and cardiac fibers in production of transmembrane voltage changes (DeltaV(m)) during shocks. Eleven isolated rabbit hearts were arterially perfused with solution containing V(m)-sensitive fluorescent dye (di-4-ANEPPS). The epicardium received shocks from symmetrical or asymmetrical electrodes to produce nominally uniform or nonuniform VGs. Extracellular electric field and DeltaV(m) produced by shocks in the absolute refractory period were measured with electrodes and a laser scanner and were simulated with a bidomain computer model that incorporated the anterior left ventricular epicardial fiber field. Measurements and simulations showed that fibers distorted extracellular voltages and influenced the DeltaV(m). For both uniform and nonuniform shocks, DeltaV(m) depended primarily on second spatial derivatives of extracellular voltages, whereas the VGs played a smaller role. Thus, 1) fiber structure influences the extracellular electric field and the distribution of DeltaV(m); 2) the DeltaV(m) depend on second spatial derivatives of extracellular voltage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10465752      PMCID: PMC1300429          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)76989-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  49 in total

1.  Ventricular intramural and epicardial potential distributions during ventricular activation and repolarization in the intact dog.

Authors:  M S Spach; R C Barr
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  Influence of electrical axis of stimulation on excitation of cardiac muscle cells.

Authors:  L Tung; N Sliz; M R Mulligan
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  Modeling defibrillation: effects of fiber curvature.

Authors:  N Trayanova; K Skouibine
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.438

4.  Transmembrane voltage changes produced by real and virtual electrodes during monophasic defibrillation shock delivered by an implantable electrode.

Authors:  I R Efimov; Y N Cheng; M Biermann; D R Van Wagoner; T N Mazgalev; P J Tchou
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-09

5.  A generalized activating function for predicting virtual electrodes in cardiac tissue.

Authors:  E A Sobie; R C Susil; L Tung
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Line stimulation parallel to myofibers enhances regional uniformity of transmembrane voltage changes in rabbit hearts.

Authors:  S B Knisley; T C Baynham
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Current injection into a two-dimensional anisotropic bidomain.

Authors:  N G Sepulveda; B J Roth; J P Wikswo
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Optical measurements of transmembrane potential changes during electric field stimulation of ventricular cells.

Authors:  S B Knisley; T F Blitchington; B C Hill; A O Grant; W M Smith; T C Pilkington; R E Ideker
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 17.367

9.  Effect of tissue anisotropy on extracellular potential fields in canine myocardium in situ.

Authors:  D E Roberts; A M Scher
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 17.367

10.  Electrical constants of trabecular muscle from mammalian heart.

Authors:  S Weidmann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  23 in total

1.  Fluorescence emission spectral shift measurements of membrane potential in single cells.

Authors:  W Y Kao; C E Davis; Y I Kim; J M Beach
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Modelling induction of a rotor in cardiac muscle by perpendicular electric shocks.

Authors:  K Skouibine; J Wall; W Krassowska; N Trayanova
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Spatial heterogeneity of transmembrane potential responses of single guinea-pig cardiac cells during electric field stimulation.

Authors:  Vinod Sharma; Leslie Tung
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Asymmetry in membrane responses to electric shocks: insights from bidomain simulations.

Authors:  Takashi Ashihara; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Transmembrane potential generated by a magnetically induced transverse electric field in a cylindrical axonal model.

Authors:  Hui Ye; Marija Cotic; Michael G Fehlings; Peter L Carlen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Optogenetic control of heart muscle in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Tobias Bruegmann; Daniela Malan; Michael Hesse; Thomas Beiert; Christopher J Fuegemann; Bernd K Fleischmann; Philipp Sasse
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-10-03       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 7.  Modeling defibrillation of the heart: approaches and insights.

Authors:  Natalia Trayanova; Jason Constantino; Takashi Ashihara; Gernot Plank
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2011

8.  Differences between left and right ventricular chamber geometry affect cardiac vulnerability to electric shocks.

Authors:  Blanca Rodríguez; Li Li; James C Eason; Igor R Efimov; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 17.367

9.  Evaluating intramural virtual electrodes in the myocardial wedge preparation: simulations of experimental conditions.

Authors:  G Plank; A Prassl; E Hofer; N A Trayanova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Transmembrane current imaging in the heart during pacing and fibrillation.

Authors:  Richard A Gray; David N Mashburn; Veniamin Y Sidorov; Bradley J Roth; Pras Pathmanathan; John P Wikswo
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.