Literature DB >> 9869957

Defibrillation efficacy with endocardial electrodes is influenced by reductions in cardiac preload.

J S Strobel1, G N Kay, G P Walcott, W M Smith, R E Ideker.   

Abstract

Little is known about the effects of cardiac preload and cardiac geometry on defibrillation efficacy with endocardial electrodes. We studied nine pigs implanted with an endocardial lead system in the normal and reduced preload state. In the reduced preload state, a balloon catheter was inflated in the inferior vena cava (IVC) for 20 seconds prior to the induction of ventricular fibrillation (VF). Complete occlusion of the IVC and reductions in preload were confirmed by observing deformation of the contrast-filled balloon, a reduction in cardiac size by fluoroscopy, and reductions in ventricular pressures. Biphasic shocks were delivered after 10 seconds of VF using a recursive up-down protocol. VF was induced 20 times for each preload state, and the 50% effective doses (ED50) for energy, current, and voltage were estimated by averaging all shocks for that state. At reduced preloads, energy decreased from 12.1 +/- 3.0 J (+/- SD) to 10.5 +/- 2.9 J (p < 0.01), voltage decreased from 415 +/- 51 V to 390 +/- 51 V (p < 0.05), and current decreased from 8.6 +/- 1.5 A to 7.6 +/- 1.5 A (p < 0.01), while impedance rose from 49.2 +/- 3.8 omega to 52.8 +/- 4.4 omega (p < 0.001). We conclude that reducing cardiac preload and cardiac size significantly lowers ED50 defibrillation energy, current, and voltage. This outcome may be caused directly by the decrease in blood volume as evidenced by increased impedance and/or may be due to changes in heart geometry and stretch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9869957     DOI: 10.1023/a:1009794813423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  31 in total

1.  Influence of cardiopulmonary bypass on internal cardiac defibrillation.

Authors:  G J Klein; D L Jones; A D Sharma; M J Kallok; G M Guiraudon
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1986-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Electrical threshold for defibrillation of canine ventricles following myocardial infarction.

Authors:  W A Tacker; L A Geddes; P S Cabler; A G Moore
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Atrial response during ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  A N Damato; S H Lau; P J Varghese; G A Bobb
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Determinants of successful nonthoracotomy cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: experience in 101 patients using two different lead systems.

Authors:  R Brooks; H Garan; D Torchiana; G J Vlahakes; G Jackson; J Newell; B A McGovern; J N Ruskin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Electrophysiological effect of volume load in isolated canine hearts.

Authors:  H Calkins; W L Maughan; D A Kass; K Sagawa; J H Levine
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1989-06

6.  Determination of left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relationships by the conductance (volume) catheter technique.

Authors:  D A Kass; T Yamazaki; D Burkhoff; W L Maughan; K Sagawa
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Electrophysiological effects of myocardial stretch and mechanical determinants of stretch-activated arrhythmias.

Authors:  M R Franz; R Cima; D Wang; D Profitt; R Kurz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Safety and efficacy of inferior vena caval occlusion to rapidly alter ventricular loading conditions in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  D Van Fossen; M E Fontana; D V Unverferth; S Walker; A J Kolibash; T M Bashore
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1987-04-15       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Clinical predictors of defibrillation energy requirements in patients treated with a nonthoracotomy defibrillator system. The ResQ Investigators.

Authors:  S A Strickberger; S L Brownstein; B L Wilkoff; A J Zinner
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Success rate versus defibrillation energy: temporal profile and the most efficient defibrillation threshold.

Authors:  Y Murakawa; B E Gliner; N V Thakor
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.749

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cardiac defibrillation and the role of mechanoelectric feedback in postshock arrhythmogenesis.

Authors:  Viatcheslav Gurev; Mary M Maleckar; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  The role of mechanoelectric feedback in vulnerability to electric shock.

Authors:  Weihui Li; Viatcheslav Gurev; Andrew D McCulloch; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 3.667

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.