BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the shock potential gradient (nablaV) and postshock activation is limited to internal defibrillation of short-duration ventricular fibrillation (SDVF). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine these variables after external defibrillation of long-duration VF (LDVF). METHODS: In six pigs, 115-20 plunge needles with three to six electrodes each were inserted to record throughout both ventricles. After the chest was closed, the biphasic defibrillation threshold (DFT) was determined after 20 seconds of SDVF with external defibrillation pads. After 7 minutes of LDVF, defibrillation shocks that were less than or equal to the SDVF DFT strength were given. RESULTS: For DFT shocks (1632 +/- 429 V), the maximum minus minimum ventricular voltage (160 +/- 100 V) was 9.8% of the shock voltage. Maximum cardiac nablaV (28.7 +/- 17 V/cm) was 4.7 +/- 2.0 times the minimum nablaV (6.2 +/- 3.5 V/cm). Although LDVF did not increase the DFT in five of the six pigs, it significantly lengthened the time to earliest postshock activation following defibrillation (1.6 +/- 2.2 seconds for SDVF and 4.9 +/- 4.3 seconds for LDVF). After LDVF, 1.3 +/- 0.8 episodes of spontaneous refibrillation occurred per animal, but there was no refibrillation after SDVF. CONCLUSION: Compared with previous studies of internal defibrillation, during external defibrillation much less of the shock voltage appears across the heart and the shock field is much more even; however, the minimum nablaV is similar. Compared with external defibrillation of SDVF, the biphasic external DFT for LDVF is not increased; however, time to earliest postshock activation triples. Refibrillation is common after LDVF but not after SDVF in these normal hearts, indicating that LDVF by itself can cause refibrillation without requiring preexisting heart disease.
BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the shock potential gradient (nablaV) and postshock activation is limited to internal defibrillation of short-duration ventricular fibrillation (SDVF). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine these variables after external defibrillation of long-duration VF (LDVF). METHODS: In six pigs, 115-20 plunge needles with three to six electrodes each were inserted to record throughout both ventricles. After the chest was closed, the biphasic defibrillation threshold (DFT) was determined after 20 seconds of SDVF with external defibrillation pads. After 7 minutes of LDVF, defibrillation shocks that were less than or equal to the SDVF DFT strength were given. RESULTS: For DFT shocks (1632 +/- 429 V), the maximum minus minimum ventricular voltage (160 +/- 100 V) was 9.8% of the shock voltage. Maximum cardiac nablaV (28.7 +/- 17 V/cm) was 4.7 +/- 2.0 times the minimum nablaV (6.2 +/- 3.5 V/cm). Although LDVF did not increase the DFT in five of the six pigs, it significantly lengthened the time to earliest postshock activation following defibrillation (1.6 +/- 2.2 seconds for SDVF and 4.9 +/- 4.3 seconds for LDVF). After LDVF, 1.3 +/- 0.8 episodes of spontaneous refibrillation occurred per animal, but there was no refibrillation after SDVF. CONCLUSION: Compared with previous studies of internal defibrillation, during external defibrillation much less of the shock voltage appears across the heart and the shock field is much more even; however, the minimum nablaV is similar. Compared with external defibrillation of SDVF, the biphasic external DFT for LDVF is not increased; however, time to earliest postshock activation triples. Refibrillation is common after LDVF but not after SDVF in these normal hearts, indicating that LDVF by itself can cause refibrillation without requiring preexisting heart disease.
Authors: T Schneider; P R Martens; H Paschen; M Kuisma; B Wolcke; B E Gliner; J K Russell; W D Weaver; L Bossaert; D Chamberlain Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-10-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jian Huang; Jonathan L Skinner; Jack M Rogers; William M Smith; William L Holman; Raymond E Ideker Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-07-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: R E Ideker; G J Klein; L Harrison; W M Smith; J Kasell; K A Reimer; A G Wallace; J J Gallagher Journal: Circulation Date: 1981-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Cheryl R Killingsworth; Sharon B Melnick; Silvio H Litovsky; Raymond E Ideker; Gregory P Walcott Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Gregory P Walcott; Sharon B Melnick; Cheryl R Killingsworth; Raymond E Ideker Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2010 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Derek J Dosdall; Jose Osorio; Robert P Robichaux; Jian Huang; Li Li; Raymond E Ideker Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2009-12-02 Impact factor: 6.343