Literature DB >> 8401133

Cost-utility analysis.

R Robinson1.   

Abstract

Decisions have to be made about allocating health resources. Currently the best economic evaluation method for doing this is cost-utility analysis. This compares the costs of different procedures with their outcomes measured in "utility based" units--that is, units that relate to a person's level of wellbeing. The most commonly used unit is the quality adjusted life year (QALY). QALYs are calculated by estimating the total life years gained from a procedure and weighting each year to reflect the quality of life in that year. To compare outcomes of different programmes the Rosser index is one measure that is widely used to assign quality of life scores to patients. Combined with a measure of life years gained from a procedure, this enables QALYs to be calculated and procedures ranked according to cost per QALY gained. In this article Ray Robinson explains the measures used and discusses how QALY league tables can be used to guide decisions on resource allocation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8401133      PMCID: PMC1678861          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.307.6908.859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  12 in total

1.  Allocating resources to health care: is the QALY (Quality Adjusted Life Year) a technical solution to a political problem?

Authors:  R A Carr-Hill
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.663

Review 2.  The use of QALYs in health care decision making.

Authors:  G Loomes; L McKenzie
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  QALYs and the equity-efficiency trade-off.

Authors:  A Wagstaff
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Quality-adjusted life years, utility theory, and healthy-years equivalents.

Authors:  A Mehrez; A Gafni
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1989 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Assumptions of the QALY procedure.

Authors:  R A Carr-Hill
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Economics of coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  A Williams
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-08-03

Review 7.  QALY league tables: handle with care.

Authors:  K Gerard; G Mooney
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure.

Authors:  M Bergner; R A Bobbitt; W B Carter; B S Gilson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Prioritising waiting lists.

Authors:  C Gudex; A Williams; M Jourdan; R Mason; J Maynard; R O'Flynn; M Rendall
Journal:  Health Trends       Date:  1990

10.  The Nottingham Health Profile as a measure of quality of life following combined heart and lung transplantation.

Authors:  B J O'Brien; N R Banner; S Gibson; M H Yacoub
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.710

View more
  57 in total

Review 1.  Economic evaluation of pharmacy services--fact or fiction?

Authors:  B George; J Silcock
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-08

2.  Setting health priorities in a Swiss canton: what do different methods tell us?

Authors:  D Schopper; A M Torres; J Pereira; C Ammon; N Cuende; M Alonso; A Baylin; A Ronchi; A Rougemont
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Management of UTI in general practice: a cost effective analysis. A commentary to facilitate an understanding of economic evaluation.

Authors:  D Kernick
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Statins and the prevention of coronary heart disease: striking a balance that is desirable, affordable, and achievable.

Authors:  L D Ritchie
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  The primary prevention of coronary heart disease with statins: practice headache or public health?

Authors:  P H Evans
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Health economic evaluation.

Authors:  A Shiell; C Donaldson; C Mitton; G Currie
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  An introduction to economic evaluation.

Authors:  S Goodacre; C McCabe
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 8.  Economics notes: types of economic evaluation.

Authors:  S Palmer; S Byford; J Raftery
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-05-15

9.  The end of the affair--public health medicine 1974-2002.

Authors:  Peter Sim
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Impact of impairment and secondary health conditions on health preference among Canadians with chronic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Catharine Craven; Sander L Hitzig; Nicole Mittmann
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.985

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.