Literature DB >> 8400609

Revisable criteria for vertebral deformity.

K M Davies1, R R Recker, R P Heaney.   

Abstract

In order to study vertebral fractures in various study populations, we earlier prepared a database of vertebral dimensions derived from spinal radiographs of 191 normal women seen regularly over 25 years. In this report we have expanded the range of measurements to include vertebral levels T3 to L5. We report means and standard deviations on anterior and posterior heights, on wedge shape and on heights relative to adjacent vertebrae. When one or both of the latter two quantities are 'far' below the mean, a vertebra is called deformed. We also describe a more flexible way of expressing damage using the number of deformed vertebrae, the degree of deformity of individual vertebrae, or the total damage to the entire spine. In assessing damage we use criteria for deformity adjusted to the limits detected by an experienced diagnostician, replacing an earlier approach based on 95% probability limits of normal variation. The normal women from whom these variations are ascertained are a low-prevalence group with respect to vertebral deformity, with prevalence of 2.8%. When the criteria developed from these women were applied to a moderate-prevalence group (37%) the model had a sensitivity of 97%, a specificity of 89% and an accuracy of 92% as regards the identification of subjects with damaged vertebrae. When used epidemiologically for a moderate-prevalence group the model has a known overestimation of 15%. the model is compared with other schemes for identifying vertebral deformities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8400609     DOI: 10.1007/bf01623831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  11 in total

1.  Classification of vertebral fractures.

Authors:  R Eastell; S L Cedel; H W Wahner; B L Riggs; L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Spine deformity index (SDI) versus other objective procedures of vertebral fracture identification in patients with osteoporosis: a comparative study.

Authors:  P Sauer; G Leidig; H W Minne; G Duckeck; W Schwarz; L Siromachkostov; R Ziegler
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Calcium absorption as a function of calcium intake.

Authors:  R P Heaney; P D Saville; R R Recker
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1975-06

4.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women.

Authors:  L J Melton; S H Kan; M A Frye; H W Wahner; W M O'Fallon; B L Riggs
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Calcium balance and calcium requirements in middle-aged women.

Authors:  R P Heaney; R R Recker; P D Saville
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  A comparison of morphometric definitions of vertebral fracture.

Authors:  R Smith-Bindman; S R Cummings; P Steiger; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Distribution of calcium absorption in middle-aged women.

Authors:  R P Heaney; R R Recker
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Normal vertebral dimensions and normal variation in serial measurements of vertebrae.

Authors:  K M Davies; R R Recker; R P Heaney
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Vertebral morphometry in diagnosis of spinal fractures.

Authors:  L R Hedlund; J C Gallagher
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1988-10

10.  Osteoporotic bone fragility. Detection by ultrasound transmission velocity.

Authors:  R P Heaney; L V Avioli; C H Chesnut; J Lappe; R R Recker; G H Brandenburger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  7 in total

1.  The association of patellar ultrasound transmissions and forearm densitometry with vertebral fracture, number and severity: the Saunders County Bone Quality Study.

Authors:  M R Stegman; K M Davies; R P Heaney; R R Recker; J M Lappe
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Prevalence and severity of vertebral fracture: the Saunders County Bone Quality Study.

Authors:  K M Davies; M R Stegman; R P Heaney; R R Recker
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Comparison of semiquantitative and quantitative techniques for the assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures.

Authors:  C Y Wu; J Li; M Jergas; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Cortical ultrasound velocity as an indicator of bone status.

Authors:  M R Stegman; R P Heaney; D Travers-Gustafson; J Leist
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis research.

Authors:  H K Genant; M Jergas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Comparison of methods for the visual identification of prevalent vertebral fracture in osteoporosis.

Authors:  G Jiang; R Eastell; N A Barrington; L Ferrar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Standardised quantitative morphometry: a modified approach for quantitative identification of prevalent vertebral deformities.

Authors:  G Jiang; L Ferrar; N A Barrington; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.